地铁车站排热系统排风组分及排热效果的数值模拟研究
摘要：以某标准地铁车站为研究对象，采用CFD软件对列车停站期间的轨底和轨顶排热温度进行了模拟计算，研究发现：从轨排风组分看，轨顶排风中来自冷凝器排风、隧道空气及站内空气的比例分别为66%、11%和23%,轨底排风中来自冷凝器排风、隧道空气及站内空气的比例分别为3%、42%和55%,轨底排风来自站内空气的比例超过50%,会造成站内冷量的浪费，甚至会出现轨底排风温度低于隧道空气温度的情况；从排热效果看，列车顶部空调冷凝器的散热量被轨顶和轨底分别排走22%和1%,列车底部电阻箱和闸瓦的散热量被轨顶和轨底分别排走5%和29%,排热系统的排热效果较差。根据模拟结果、理论散热量及实测温度等参数，计算得到轨顶和轨底平均排风温度，并与实测数据进行了对比，计算值与实测值基本一致，验证了模拟计算的准确性。
关键词：地铁车站排热系统排风组分排热效果轨顶排风轨底排风冷凝器
尊敬的用户，本篇文章需要2元，点击支付交费后阅读
限时优惠福利：领取VIP会员
全年期刊、VIP视频免费!
全年期刊、VIP视频免费!
参考文献[1] 城市轨道交通2021年度数据统计和分析[J].现代城市轨道交通，2022(5):117.
[2] 王静伟.屏蔽门对隧道通风系统设计影响与分析[J].建筑热能通风空调，2006,25(1):88- 90.
[3] 董志周，吴喜平.地铁车站热环境分析[J].上海节能，2003(5):36- 40.
[4] 施仲衡.地下铁道设计与施工[M].2版.西安：陕西科技出版社，2006:465- 473.
[5] 华正博.活塞效应效率对地铁轨道区排热的影响[J].制冷与空调，2014,28(2):183- 185.
[6] 曾甫海.提高地铁车站排热系统效率的思路浅析[J].暖通空调，2013,43(8):83- 85.
[7] 王峰，雷波.地铁隧道通风系统节能研究[J].地下空间与工程学报，2012,8(1):172- 176.
[8] 郝盛.地铁车站隧道轨顶排热风口设置形式研究[J].建筑热能通风空调，2011,30(6):45- 47.
[9] 叶晨辉，曹艳华，臧建彬.屏蔽门地铁车站系统排热数值模拟研究[J].制冷，2019,35(2):12- 17.
[10] 欧阳沁，江泳，朱颖心，等.关于地铁隧道区间段阻塞工况临界通风速度的研究[J].地铁与轻轨，2002(2):34- 41.
[2] 王静伟.屏蔽门对隧道通风系统设计影响与分析[J].建筑热能通风空调，2006,25(1):88- 90.
[3] 董志周，吴喜平.地铁车站热环境分析[J].上海节能，2003(5):36- 40.
[4] 施仲衡.地下铁道设计与施工[M].2版.西安：陕西科技出版社，2006:465- 473.
[5] 华正博.活塞效应效率对地铁轨道区排热的影响[J].制冷与空调，2014,28(2):183- 185.
[6] 曾甫海.提高地铁车站排热系统效率的思路浅析[J].暖通空调，2013,43(8):83- 85.
[7] 王峰，雷波.地铁隧道通风系统节能研究[J].地下空间与工程学报，2012,8(1):172- 176.
[8] 郝盛.地铁车站隧道轨顶排热风口设置形式研究[J].建筑热能通风空调，2011,30(6):45- 47.
[9] 叶晨辉，曹艳华，臧建彬.屏蔽门地铁车站系统排热数值模拟研究[J].制冷，2019,35(2):12- 17.
[10] 欧阳沁，江泳，朱颖心，等.关于地铁隧道区间段阻塞工况临界通风速度的研究[J].地铁与轻轨，2002(2):34- 41.
Numerical simulation on exhaust components and heat removal effect of heat exhaust systems in underground railway stations
Abstract: Taking a standard underground railway station as the research object, this paper uses CFD software to simulate and calculate the heat exhaust temperatures at the bottom and top of the rail during the period of train stop. It is found that from the perspective of exhaust components, the proportion of the air exhaust at the rail top(OTE) from condensers, tunnel and station is 66%, 11% and 23%, respectively, and the proportion of the air exhaust at the rail bottom(UPE) is 3%, 42% and 55%, respectively. The proportion of UPE from the station is more than 50%, which will cause a waste of cooling capacity in the station, and even lead to the situation that the temperature of UPE is lower than the air temperature in the tunnel. From the perspective of heat exhaust effect, the heat emission of the condenser at the train top is discharged by 22% and 1% respectively by OTE and UPE, the heat emission of the resistance box and the brake shoe at the bottom of the train is discharged by 5% and 29% respectively by OTE and UPE, and the heat removal effect of the heat exhaust system is poor. According to the simulation results, theoretical heat dissipation, measured temperature and other parameters, the average exhaust air temperatures of OTE and UPE are calculated and compared with the measured data, and it is found that the calculated values are basically consistent with the measured values, which verifies the accuracy of the simulation calculation.
Keywords: underground railway station; heat exhaust system; exhaust air component; heat exhaust effect; air exhaust at rail top; air exhaust at rail bottom; condenser;
526
0
0