苏州中级法院审判业务大楼超限高层结构设计与分析

引用文献:

朱宏程 ,宋鸿誉 ,轩鹏. 苏州中级法院审判业务大楼超限高层结构设计与分析[J]. 建筑结构,2022,48(07):80-85.

ZHU Hongcheng, SONG Hongyu, XUAN Peng. Design and analysis of over-limit high-rise structure of the trial business building of Suzhou Intermediate Court[J]. Building Structure,2022,48(07):80-85.

作者:朱宏程 ,宋鸿誉 ,轩鹏
单位:启迪设计集团股份有限公司
摘要:苏州中级法院审判业务大楼地上7层,底部裙房为方形平面且中庭开大洞,上部塔楼为偏置的L形平面,南侧及东侧底部存在12根跨3层的穿层柱,造成结构平面及竖向均不规则,使结构超限。结构设计根据平面和竖向特点,采取三个区域剪力墙筒布置的框架-剪力墙结构体系,保证了一定抗扭刚度。采用SATWE和MIDAS Building软件建立了两个不同的模型进行了多遇地震下的弹性反应谱分析以及弹性时程分析,并将两种方法的结果进行对比。采用静力推覆法Pushover进行大震下结构静力弹塑性分析,还进行了穿层柱地震剪力和屈曲稳定分析。结果表明各项指标满足规范要求,采取的措施可行、有效,此结构方案具有较好的抗震承载能力。
关键词:框架-剪力墙,超限高层结构,剪力墙筒,L形平面,穿层柱
作者简介:朱宏程,学士,高级工程师,一级注册结构工程师,主要从事建筑结构设计,Email:hongcheng.zhu@siad-c.com。
基金:
尊敬的用户,本篇文章需要2元,点击支付交费后阅读
参考文献[1] 建筑抗震设计规范:GB 50011—2010[S].2016年版.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2016.
[2] 高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程:JGJ 3—2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011.
[3] 超限高层建筑工程抗震设防专项审查技术要点:建质[2015]67号[S].北京:中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部,2015.
[4] 张敏,张杜,袁雪芬,等.西交利物浦大学行政信息楼关键构件设计[J].建筑结构,2012,42(1):12-15.
[5] 宋鸿誉,张敏,沈银良,等.苏州绿景NEO结构设计与分析[J].建筑结构,2017,47(20):30-34.
[6] 孙训方,方孝淑,关来泰.材料力学(Ⅰ)[M].5版.北京:高等教育出版社,2009.
Design and analysis of over-limit high-rise structure of the trial business building of Suzhou Intermediate Court
ZHU Hongcheng, SONG Hongyu, XUAN Peng
(Tus-Design Group Co.,Ltd.)
Abstract: The trial business building of Suzhou Intermediate Court has 7 floors above ground. The podium at the bottom is a square plane with a large hole in the atrium. The upper tower is an offset L-shaped plane. There are 12 through-layer columns spanning 3 floors on the bottom of the south side and the east side. Structural plane and vertical are irregular, making the structure overrun. The structural design adopts a frame-shear wall structure system with three-area shear wall tube arrangement according to the plane and vertical characteristics to ensure a certain torsional rigidity. Using SATWE and MIDAS Building software, two different models were established to conduct elastic response spectrum analysis and elastic time history analysis under frequent earthquake, and the results of the two methods were compared. The static pushover method was used to carry out the static elastic-plastic analysis of the structure under large earthquake, and the seismic shear force and buckling stability analysis of the through-layer column were also carried out. The results show that the indicators meet the requirements of the specification, the measures taken are feasible and effective, and the structural scheme has a good seismic bearing capacity.
Keywords: frame-shear wall; over-limit high-rise structure; shear wall cylinder; L-shaped plane; through column
442 0 0
文字:     A-     A+     默认 取消