苏州宏海国际广场超限高层结构设计

引用文献：

陈磊，赵宏康，陈光，潘勇. 苏州宏海国际广场超限高层结构设计[J]. 建筑结构，2022，48（07）：24-27，36.

CHEN Lei ，ZHAO Hongkang， CHEN Guang ，PAN Yong. Super high-rise structure design in Suzhou Honghai International Plaza[J]. Building Structure，2022,48（07）：24-27，36.

作者：陈磊，赵宏康，陈光，潘勇

单位：启迪设计集团股份有限公司，苏州工业园区苏相合作区建设管理局，无锡市广盈电力设计有限公司

摘要：对苏州宏海国际广场超限高层结构设计要点进行了说明与分析。针对工程“工”字形平面不规则提出布置方案，在工字形平面“翼缘”与“腹板”相交处设两个围合成整体的钢筋混凝土筒，并在凹口两侧布置剪力墙与混凝土筒相连。采用SATWE和MIDAS Building软件对结构进行整体分析，采用PKPM-SAUSAGE软件进行弹塑性时程分析，结果表明结构布置合理，整体抗震性能良好。针对抗震薄弱部位和关键构件制定抗震性能化指标，底部加强部位剪力墙和框架柱受剪承载力按中震弹性控制，偏心受压承载力按中震不屈服设计；连接薄弱部位、竖向收进楼层的楼板按中震弹性设计。对设防烈度地震作用下名义拉应力大于混凝土抗拉强度标准值的墙体，设置型钢承担全部拉力，以保证结构安全。

关键词：超限高层结构，性能化设计，动力弹塑性时程分析

作者简介：陈磊，硕士，高级工程师，一级注册结构工程师，主要研究方向为高层结构设计，Email:lei.chen@siad-c.com。

基金：

尊敬的用户，本篇文章需要2元，点击支付交费后阅读

限时优惠福利：领取VIP会员
全年期刊、会议视频
全部免费！培训视频打折！

参考文献[1] 赵宏康.框架-双核心筒高层建筑结构性能研究及设计建议[J].建筑结构，2017,47(11):53-60.
[2] 建筑抗震设计规范：GB 50011—2010[S].2016年版.北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2016.
[3] 超限高层建筑工程抗震设防专项审查技术要点：建质[2015]67号[A].北京：中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部，2015.
[4] 王昆，高巍，李伟政，等.联想北京园区某办公楼结构设计[J].建筑结构，2016,46(17):54-57.
[5] 周颖，吕西林.中震弹性设计与中震不屈服设计的理解及实施[J].结构工程师，2008,24(6):1-5.
[6] 张志刚，张敏，曹慧玲，等.南通圆融广场结构设计[J].建筑结构，2017,47(20):9-12.
[7] 高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程：JGJ 3—2010[S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2011.
[8] 辛蕾.弹塑性分析在高层建筑结构上设计中的应用[J].中国建筑金属结构，2021(2):129-130.
[9] 高性能弹塑性动力时程分析软件 PKPM-SAUSAGE 2017 用户手册[M].广州：广州建研数力建筑科技有限公司，2014.

Super high-rise structure design in Suzhou Honghai International Plaza

CHEN Lei ，ZHAO Hongkang， CHEN Guang ，PAN Yong

(Tus-Design Group Co., Ltd. Cooperative Zone Construction Administration Bureau,Suzhou Industrial Park Wuxi Guangying Electric Power Design Co., Ltd.)

Abstract: The key design highlights of the super high-rise structures in Suzhou Honghai International Plaza were elaborated and analyzed. In view of the irregularity of the "I"-shaped plane of the project, a layout scheme was proposed. Two reinforced concrete cylinders are set up at the intersection of the "flange" and "web" of the I-shaped plane, shear walls were arranged on both sides of the recess to connect with the concrete cylinder. SATWE and MIDAS Building software were used to conduct overall analysis of the structural, and PKPM-SAUSAGE software was used to conduct elasto-plastic time history analysis. The results show that the structural layout is reasonable and the overall seismic performance is good. The seismic performance indicators were formulated for the weak seismic parts and key components. The shear bearing capacity of the shear wall and frame column at the bottom reinforced part is controlled according to the middle earthquake elasticity, and the eccentric compression bearing capacity is designed according to the middle earthquake non-yielding design. The floor slabs connecting the weak parts and vertically retracting the floors were designed according to the mid-seismic elasticity. For the wall whose nominal tensile stress is greater than the standard value of concrete tensile strength under the action of fortification intensity earthquake, the section steel was set to bear all the tensile force to ensure the safety of the structure.

Keywords: super high-rise structure; performance-based design; dynamic elasto-plastic time history analysis

441 0 0