动车检查库不同通风系统降温效果对比研究

作者:邹磊 于靖华 郭辉 毕庆焕 田利伟 赵金罡 宋一 曾现宏 冷康鑫
单位:华中科技大学 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司
摘要:基于实测数据开展了不同通风系统对夏热冬冷地区动车检查库降温效果的对比研究。结果表明:屋顶机械排风系统设计换气次数宜为2~4 h-1;直接蒸发冷却送风系统换气次数宜为3~4 h-1;诱导通风系统推荐采用中部送风、两侧排风的系统形式,机械送排风换气次数宜为2 h-1;各通风方案在推荐设计值下都能满足湿球黑球温度限值30℃的舒适性要求;综合对比各方案,机械排风系统造价最低,诱导通风系统效果最好,蒸发冷却送风系统适合于改善局部热环境。
关键词:动车检查库热压通风机械排风直接蒸发冷却诱导通风降温效果
作者简介:邹磊,男,1998年生,硕士研究生;*于靖华(通信作者),430070湖北省武汉市洪山区珞喻路1037号华中科技大学环境科学与工程学院,E-mail:yujinghua@hust.edu.cn;
尊敬的用户,本篇文章需要2元,点击支付交费后阅读
参考文献[1] 王利军,王利锋,张雄.中国高速铁路动车段及运用所设计技术发展[J].高速铁路技术,2020,11(4):36- 42.

[2] 陈锦宗.动车组检修资源配置优化研究[D].北京:北京交通大学,2020:15- 26.

[3] NUNFAM V F,ADUSEI-ASANTE K,VAN ETTEN E J,et al.Social impacts of occupational heat stress and adaptation strategies of workers:a narrative synthesis of the literature[J].Science of the total environment,2018,643:1542- 1552.

[4] MATHEE A,OBA J,ROSE A.Climate change impacts on working people (the HOTHAPS initiative):findings of the South African pilot study[J].Global health action,2010,3:5612- 5620.

[5] BERNARD T E,POURMOGHANI M.Prediction of workplace wet bulb global temperature[J].Applied occupational and environmental hygiene,1999,14(2):126- 134.

[6] BERNARD T E,CROSS R R.Heat stress management:case study in an aluminum smelter[J].International journal of industrial ergonomics,1999,23(5/6):609- 620.

[7] WANG Y,GAO J,XING X,et al.Measurement and evaluation of indoor thermal environment in a naturally ventilated industrial building with high temperature heat sources[J].Building and environment,2016,96:35- 45.

[8] MENG X J,XIONG H H,YANG H G,et al.Dynamic prediction of indoor wet bulb globe temperature in an industrial workshop[J].Applied thermal engineering,2021,195:1- 7.

[9] ISO.Ergonomics of the thermal environment:assessment of heat stress using the WBGT (wet bulb globe temperature) index:ISO 7243:2017 [S].Geneva:ISO,2017:7- 8.

[10] 中国有色工程有限公司,中国恩菲工程技术有限公司.工业建筑供暖通风与空气调节设计规范:GB 50019—2015 [S].北京:中国计划出版社,2015:7- 8.

[11] 邢骁.工业热厂房中复合通风系统下室内热环境及临界排风量特性研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2016:64- 65.

[12] 陶文铨.数值传热学[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,2001:210- 220.

[13] ASHRAE.Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy:ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2020[S].Atlanta:ASHRAE Inc.,2020:15- 20.
Comparative study on cooling effect of different ventilation systems in electric multiple unit inspection workshop
Zou Lei Yu Jinghua Guo Hui Bi Qinghuan Tian Liwei Zhao Jingang Song Yi Zeng Xianhong Leng Kangxin
(Huazhong University of Science and Technology China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co.,Ltd.)
Abstract: This paper carries out a comparative study on the cooling effect of different ventilation systems in electric multiple unit(EMU) inspection workshop in hot summer and cold winter zone based on the measured data. The results show that the design air change rate of the roof mechanical exhaust system should be 2-4 h-1. The air change rate of the direct evaporative cooling air supply system should be 3-4 h-1. The induction ventilation system is recommended to use the system form of air supply in the middle and exhaust on both sides, and the air change rate of mechanical air supply and exhaust should be 2 h-1. Each ventilation scheme can meet the comfort requirement of wet bulb globe temperature(WBGT) limit of 30 ℃ under the recommended design value. Through comprehensive comparison of the schemes, the mechanical exhaust system has the lowest cost, the induction ventilation system has the best effect, and the evaporative cooling air supply system is suitable for improving the local thermal environment.
Keywords: EMU inspection workshop; thermal pressure ventilation; mechanical exhaust; direct evaporative cooling; induction ventilation; cooling effect;
105 0 0
文字:     A-     A+     默认 取消