某连体住宅结构设计关键问题探讨

引用文献:

杨承超 罗列 王四清 马立明 彭志伟. 某连体住宅结构设计关键问题探讨[J]. 建筑结构,2022,48(22):72-78.

YANG Chengchao LUO Lie WANG Siqing MA Liming PENG Zhiwei. Discussion on key issues in structural design of a conjoined residence[J]. Building Structure,2022,48(22):72-78.

作者:杨承超 罗列 王四清 马立明 彭志伟
单位:湖南省建筑设计院集团股份有限公司
摘要:某项目中两栋高层住宅通过型钢桁架连接组成连体结构,下部主体采用剪力墙结构,型钢桁架与两端主楼采用刚性连接。考虑竖向地震作用,对整体结构进行了抗震性能分析,结果表明,整体结构和构件性能均能满足预设的性能目标要求。分析了连体结构混凝土楼板在大震作用下的工作性能和连体结构在中震和大震作用下的受力性能,同时对型钢桁架两端与主楼连接的连接节点进行了有限元分析,分析结果表明,钢桁架在中震和大震作用下均处于弹性状态,连体结构楼板在大震作用下的受力满足要求。考虑到连体结构跨度较大,对其进行了人致激励下的加速度响应分析,并采用拆除构件法对连体结构进行了抗连续倒塌分析,结果表明,连体结构舒适度可以满足要求,且连接结构能够满足抗连续倒塌要求。
关键词:连体结构;型钢桁架;弹塑性时程;舒适度分析;抗连续倒塌分析;
作者简介:杨承超,硕士,高级工程师,一级注册结构工程师,主要从事结构设计工作,Email:106004025@qq.com。
基金:湖南省建筑设计院集团股份有限公司科技研发课题(KY0300-0000-2021-0204)。
尊敬的用户,本篇文章需要2元,点击支付交费后阅读
参考文献[1] 邬喆华,孙炳楠,楼文娟,等.不对称连体双塔楼结构的动力分析[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2003,37(5):560-565.
[2] 陈文兵,唐家祥.水平任意向地震输入下双塔楼连体结构的动力分析[J].振动与冲击,2003,22(1):29-32,28.
[3] 杨维垣.大底盘双塔连体高层建筑神舟大厦结构设计[J].工业建筑,2001,31(9):20-22.
[4] 杨红卫,张晶波,郭志东,等.弧形平面高层连体结构平扭耦联自振特性分析[J].建筑结构,2006,36(2):15-18.
[5] 王吉民,黄坤耀,孙炳楠,等.连体刚度和位置对双塔连体高层建筑受力性能的影响[J].建筑结构,2002,32(8):59-62.
[6] 建筑抗震设计规范:GB 50011—2010[S].2016年版.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2016.
[7] 高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程:JGJ 3—2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011.
[8] 钢结构设计标准:GB 50017—2017[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2018.
[9] 建筑结构荷载规范:GB 50011—2012[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2012.
[10] 湖南富基广场项目工程场地地震安全性评价报告[R].北京:北京吉奥星地震工程勘测研究院,2014.
[11] 超限高层建筑工程抗震设防专项审查技术要点:建质[2015]67号[A].北京:中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部,2015.
[12] 建筑楼盖结构振动舒适度技术标准:JGJ/T 441—2019[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2020.
[13] 建筑结构抗倒塌设计规范:CECS 392∶2014[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2015.
Discussion on key issues in structural design of a conjoined residence
YANG Chengchao LUO Lie WANG Siqing MA Liming PENG Zhiwei
(Hunan Architectural Design Institute Group Co., Ltd.)
Abstract: In a project, two high-rise residential buildings are connected by section steel truss to form a conjoined structure. The lower main body adopts the shear wall structure, and the section steel truss is rigidly connected to the main buildings at both ends. Considering the vertical earthquake action, the seismic performance analysis of the whole structure was carried out. The results show that the performance of the whole structure and components can meet the preset performance target requirements. The working performance of the conjoined structure concrete floor under the action of the rare earthquake and the mechanical performance of the conjoined structure under the action of the fortification earthquake and the rare earthquake were analyzed. At the same time, the finite element analysis was carried out on the connection nodes between the two ends of the section steel truss and the main building.The results show that the steel truss is in an elastic state under the action of the fortification earthquake and the rare earthquake, and the stress of the floor slab of the conjoined structure under the action of the rare earthquakes meets the requirements. Considering the large span of the conjoined structure, the acceleration response analysis under human-induced excitation was carried out, and the anti-progressive collapse resistance analysis of the conjoined structure was carried out by using the member removal method. The results show that the comfort of the conjoined structure can meet the requirements, and the conjoined structure can meet the requirements of anti-progressive collapse resistance.
Keywords: conjoined structure; section steel truss; elastic-plastic time history; comfort analysis; anti-progressive collapse resistance analysis
387 0 0
文字:     A-     A+     默认 取消