准稳态建筑负荷计算软件IBE与动态模拟软件TRNSYS在寒冷地区应用的对比研究
摘要：介绍了ISO 13790中提出的准稳态建筑负荷计算方法, 为了说明这种计算方法的准确性, 针对寒冷地区单区和多区模型算例, 对比分析了以这种计算方法为核心开发的软件IBE和动态负荷模拟软件TRNSYS的计算结果, 并在单区模型中讨论了不同南窗面积、内热和通风作息对于计算结果的影响。结果显示, 2种软件负荷计算结果的相对偏差绝大部分小于20%, 但在南窗面积较小时年累积热负荷计算结果存在较大偏差, 原因是此时IBE对动态系数估算过低。总的来说, ISO 13790中的准稳态建筑负荷计算方法适用于我国寒冷地区居住建筑的负荷计算, 计算精度满足工程需求。
关键词：准稳态负荷计算 动态模拟 IBE TRNSYS 单区 多区 南窗面积 内热和通风作息
尊敬的用户，本篇文章需要2元，点击支付交费后阅读
限时优惠福利：领取VIP会员
全年期刊、VIP视频免费!
全年期刊、VIP视频免费!
参考文献[1]徐伟.关于我国近零能耗建筑发展的思考[J].建筑科学, 2016, 32 (4) :1-5
[2]徐伟, 邹瑜, 孙德宇.《被动式超低能耗绿色建筑技术导则》编制思路及要点[J].工程建设标准化, 2016 (3) :17-21
[3]WAUMAN B.Evaluation of the accuracy of the implementation of dynamic effects in the quasi steady-state calculation method for school buildings[J].Energy and Buildings, 2013, 65:173-184
[4]WITTE M J, HENNINGER R H, GLAZER J, et al.Testing and validation of a new building energy simulation program[C]∥Proceedings of Seventh International IBPSA Conference, 2001:353-359
[5]清华大学DeST开发组.建筑环境系统模拟分析方法——DeST[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2006:40
[6]HUANG J.Using EnergyPlus for California title-24compliance calculations[C]∥Proceedings of SimBuild 2006, 2006:1-9
[7]ANDOLSUN S.A comparison of EnergyPlus to DOE-2.1E:mutiple cases ranging from a sealed box to a residential building[C]∥Proceedings of SimBuild 2010, 2010:1-8
[8]WADDELL C.Solar gain and cooling load comparison using energy modeling software[C]∥Proceedings of SimBuild2010, 2010:150-159
[9]朱丹丹, 燕达, 王闯, 等.建筑能耗模拟软件对比:DeST、EnergyPlus and DOE-2[J].建筑科学, 2012, 28 (增刊2) , 218-227
[10]KIM Y J.Stochastic comparison between simplified energy calculation and dynamic simulation[J].Energy and Buildings, 2013, 64:332-342
[11]DIJK H V, SPIEKMAN M.Monthly method for calculating energy performance in the context of European building regulations[C]∥Proceedings of the Ninth International IBPSA Conference, 2005:255-262
[12]KOKOGIANNAKIS G.Support for the integration of simulation in the European energy performance of buildings directive[J].Waste Management, 2008, 20 (5) :435-442
[13]JOKISALO J, KURNITSKI J.Performance of EN ISO13790utilization factor heat demand calculation method in a cold climate[J].Energy and Buildings, 2007, 39 (2) :236-247
[14]CORRADO V, FABRIZIO E.Assessment of building cooling energy need through a quasi-steady state model:simplified correlation for gain-loss mismatch[J].Energy and Buildings, 2007, 39 (5) :569-579
[15]BRUNO R.An analytical model for the evaluation of the correction factor Fwof solar gains through glazed surfaces defined in EN ISO 13790[J].Energy and Buildings, 2015, 96:1-19
[16]OROSA J A, OLIVEIRA A C.Implementation of a method in EN ISO 13790for calculating the utilization factor taking into account different permeability levels of internal coverings[J].Energy and Buildings, 2010, 42 (5) :598-604
[2]徐伟, 邹瑜, 孙德宇.《被动式超低能耗绿色建筑技术导则》编制思路及要点[J].工程建设标准化, 2016 (3) :17-21
[3]WAUMAN B.Evaluation of the accuracy of the implementation of dynamic effects in the quasi steady-state calculation method for school buildings[J].Energy and Buildings, 2013, 65:173-184
[4]WITTE M J, HENNINGER R H, GLAZER J, et al.Testing and validation of a new building energy simulation program[C]∥Proceedings of Seventh International IBPSA Conference, 2001:353-359
[5]清华大学DeST开发组.建筑环境系统模拟分析方法——DeST[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2006:40
[6]HUANG J.Using EnergyPlus for California title-24compliance calculations[C]∥Proceedings of SimBuild 2006, 2006:1-9
[7]ANDOLSUN S.A comparison of EnergyPlus to DOE-2.1E:mutiple cases ranging from a sealed box to a residential building[C]∥Proceedings of SimBuild 2010, 2010:1-8
[8]WADDELL C.Solar gain and cooling load comparison using energy modeling software[C]∥Proceedings of SimBuild2010, 2010:150-159
[9]朱丹丹, 燕达, 王闯, 等.建筑能耗模拟软件对比:DeST、EnergyPlus and DOE-2[J].建筑科学, 2012, 28 (增刊2) , 218-227
[10]KIM Y J.Stochastic comparison between simplified energy calculation and dynamic simulation[J].Energy and Buildings, 2013, 64:332-342
[11]DIJK H V, SPIEKMAN M.Monthly method for calculating energy performance in the context of European building regulations[C]∥Proceedings of the Ninth International IBPSA Conference, 2005:255-262
[12]KOKOGIANNAKIS G.Support for the integration of simulation in the European energy performance of buildings directive[J].Waste Management, 2008, 20 (5) :435-442
[13]JOKISALO J, KURNITSKI J.Performance of EN ISO13790utilization factor heat demand calculation method in a cold climate[J].Energy and Buildings, 2007, 39 (2) :236-247
[14]CORRADO V, FABRIZIO E.Assessment of building cooling energy need through a quasi-steady state model:simplified correlation for gain-loss mismatch[J].Energy and Buildings, 2007, 39 (5) :569-579
[15]BRUNO R.An analytical model for the evaluation of the correction factor Fwof solar gains through glazed surfaces defined in EN ISO 13790[J].Energy and Buildings, 2015, 96:1-19
[16]OROSA J A, OLIVEIRA A C.Implementation of a method in EN ISO 13790for calculating the utilization factor taking into account different permeability levels of internal coverings[J].Energy and Buildings, 2010, 42 (5) :598-604
Comparison between quasi-steady energy calculation software IBE and dynamic simulation software TRNSYS applied to cold zone
Abstract: Presents the quasi-steady building energy calculation method proposed by ISO 13790.To verify its calculation accuracy, compares the calculation results of IBE based on the quasi-steady method with a validated dynamic simulation tool TRNSYS in both single-zone and multi-zone models in cold zone.Discusses the effects of different southern window areas and internal heat and ventilation schedules on the calculation results in the single-zone model.The results show that the relative deviations of the two softwares load calculation results are mostly less than 20%, but there is a large deviation in the annual cumulative heat load calculation results when the southern window area is small, due to the underestimated dynamic factor by IBE.In general, the quasi-steady method is suitable for the Chinese residential building energy calculation in cold zone, and the calculation precision meets engineering requirements.
Keywords: quasi-steady energy calculation; dynamic simulation; IBE; TRNSYS; single-zone; multi-zone; southern window area; internal heat and ventilation schedule;
1027
12
12