基于熵权物元可拓理论的高层建筑火灾韧性评价
引用文献：
付小千 胡肖 张骞 杨永斌. 基于熵权物元可拓理论的高层建筑火灾韧性评价[J]. 建筑结构，2023，48（13）：142-146，141.
FU Xiaoqian HU Xiao ZHANG Qian YANG Yongbin. Evaluation for fire resilience of high-rise buildings based on matter-element extension theory of entropy weight[J]. Building Structure，2023,48（13）：142-146，141.
摘要：为降低高层建筑火灾的发生率，基于演进韧性视角，对高层建筑的火灾韧性作出了明确定义。结合高层建筑火灾的具体特征，将韧性框架的4个维度重新定义和划分，分别从高层建筑的鲁棒性、冗余性、迅速性和策略性4个维度构建评价指标。结合熵权法和物元可拓学理论实现对高层建筑火灾韧性等级的客观评价，并进行实例验证。结果表明：高层建筑火灾的韧性是火灾发生期间建筑吸收、应对、恢复和学习能力的函数，4个维度权重分别为0.324、0.152、0.369、0.153,可知高层建筑的火灾韧性首要强调建筑的迅速性，即建筑对火灾的事后恢复能力，该结果完全符合韧性的核心概念。所选的高层建筑实例的火灾韧性等级为S4,火灾韧性为“差”状态，该评价结果与实际情况相符合。
关键词：演进韧性；韧性框架；高层建筑；熵权物元可拓理论；韧性评价等级；
基金：
尊敬的用户，本篇文章需要2元，点击支付交费后阅读
限时优惠福利：领取VIP会员
全年期刊、会议视频
全部免费！培训视频打折！
全年期刊、会议视频
全部免费！培训视频打折！
参考文献[1] HOLLING C S.Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J].Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1973,4:1-23.
[2] TIMMERMAN P.Vulnerability,resilience and the col-lapse of society:a review of models and possible cli-matic applications[R].Toronto:Institute for Environmental Studies,University of Toronto,1981.
[3] BERGSTRÖM J,VAN WINSEN R,HENRIQSON E.On the rationale of resilience in the domain of safety:a literature review[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2015,141:131-141.
[4] 黄浪，吴超，杨冕，等.韧性理论在安全科学领域中的应用[J].中国安全科学学报，2017,27(3):1-6.
[5] 王晓翠，张礼敬，陶刚，等.基于TOPSIS法的桥梁火灾韧性评估模型[J].中国安全科学学报，2018,28(4):59-64.
[6] 闫晨，陈锦涛，段芮，等.韧性城市视角下的历史街区防火韧性评估体系构建[J].中国安全生产科学技术，2020,16(10):133-138.
[7] 王梦瑶，张靖岩，杨玲，等.面向韧性城市的高层建筑消防安全韧性评估[J].建筑科学，2020,36(5):115-119.
[8] 余健，房莉，仓定帮，等.熵权模糊物元模型在土地生态安全评价中的应用[J].农业工程学报，2012,28(5):260-266.
[9] 阳富强，朱伟方，刘晓霞.基于WSR和熵权物元可拓理论的地铁火灾风险评价[J].安全与环境工程，2017,24(6):184-188.
[10] 白雯，谢雄刚，代伟，等.基于熵权物元可拓的矿井火灾安全评价[J].煤矿安全，2017,48(7):196-199,203.
[11] MACASKILL K,GUTHRIE P.Multiple interpretations of resilience in disaster risk management[J].Procedia Economics and Finance,2014,18:667-674.
[12] BERKES F,FOLKE C,COLDING J.Linking social and ecological systems:management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience[J].Choice Reviews Online,1998,36(1).
[13] National Academy of Engineering.Engineering within ecological constraints[M].America:National Academies Press,1996.
[14] WALKER B,HOLLING C S,CARPENTER S R,et al.Resilience,adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems[J].Ecology and Society,2004,9(2):art5.
[15] 钟茂华，孟洋洋.安全生产韧性管理对雄安新区发展的借鉴[J].中国安全生产科学技术，2018,14(8):12-17.
[16] MICHEL BRUNEAU,STEPHANIE E CHANG,RONALD T EGUCHI,et,al.A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities[J].Earthquake Spectra,2003,19(4):733.
[17] 蔡文.物元模型及其应用[M].北京：科学技术文献出版社，1994.
[18] 周薇，李筱菁.基于信息熵理论的综合评价方法[J].科学技术与工程，2010,10(23):5839-5843.
[2] TIMMERMAN P.Vulnerability,resilience and the col-lapse of society:a review of models and possible cli-matic applications[R].Toronto:Institute for Environmental Studies,University of Toronto,1981.
[3] BERGSTRÖM J,VAN WINSEN R,HENRIQSON E.On the rationale of resilience in the domain of safety:a literature review[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2015,141:131-141.
[4] 黄浪，吴超，杨冕，等.韧性理论在安全科学领域中的应用[J].中国安全科学学报，2017,27(3):1-6.
[5] 王晓翠，张礼敬，陶刚，等.基于TOPSIS法的桥梁火灾韧性评估模型[J].中国安全科学学报，2018,28(4):59-64.
[6] 闫晨，陈锦涛，段芮，等.韧性城市视角下的历史街区防火韧性评估体系构建[J].中国安全生产科学技术，2020,16(10):133-138.
[7] 王梦瑶，张靖岩，杨玲，等.面向韧性城市的高层建筑消防安全韧性评估[J].建筑科学，2020,36(5):115-119.
[8] 余健，房莉，仓定帮，等.熵权模糊物元模型在土地生态安全评价中的应用[J].农业工程学报，2012,28(5):260-266.
[9] 阳富强，朱伟方，刘晓霞.基于WSR和熵权物元可拓理论的地铁火灾风险评价[J].安全与环境工程，2017,24(6):184-188.
[10] 白雯，谢雄刚，代伟，等.基于熵权物元可拓的矿井火灾安全评价[J].煤矿安全，2017,48(7):196-199,203.
[11] MACASKILL K,GUTHRIE P.Multiple interpretations of resilience in disaster risk management[J].Procedia Economics and Finance,2014,18:667-674.
[12] BERKES F,FOLKE C,COLDING J.Linking social and ecological systems:management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience[J].Choice Reviews Online,1998,36(1).
[13] National Academy of Engineering.Engineering within ecological constraints[M].America:National Academies Press,1996.
[14] WALKER B,HOLLING C S,CARPENTER S R,et al.Resilience,adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems[J].Ecology and Society,2004,9(2):art5.
[15] 钟茂华，孟洋洋.安全生产韧性管理对雄安新区发展的借鉴[J].中国安全生产科学技术，2018,14(8):12-17.
[16] MICHEL BRUNEAU,STEPHANIE E CHANG,RONALD T EGUCHI,et,al.A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities[J].Earthquake Spectra,2003,19(4):733.
[17] 蔡文.物元模型及其应用[M].北京：科学技术文献出版社，1994.
[18] 周薇，李筱菁.基于信息熵理论的综合评价方法[J].科学技术与工程，2010,10(23):5839-5843.
Evaluation for fire resilience of high-rise buildings based on matter-element extension theory of entropy weight
Abstract: In order to reduce the incidence of high-rise building fires, based on the evolutionary resilience perspective, the fire resilience of high-rise buildings has been clearly defined. Combined with the specific characteristics of high-rise building fires, four dimensions of the resilience framework have been redefined and divided. Four dimensions of robustness, redundancy, rapidity and strategy were used to construct evaluation indicators. Combined with entropy weight method and matter-element extension theory to achieve objective evaluation of fire toughness levels of high-rise buildings, and verify them with examples. The results show that the fire resilience of high-rise buildings is a function of the building′s ability to absorb, respond, recover and learn during the fire, the weights of the four dimensions are 0.324, 0.152, 0.369 and 0.153 respectively. It can be seen that the fire resilience of high-rise buildings mainly emphasizes the rapidity of buildings, that is the building′s ability to recover from fire after the event, the result is in full compliance with the core concept of resilience. The resilience grade of the selected building instance is S4, and the fire resilience is “poor”. The evaluation result is consistent with the actual situation.
Keywords: evolutionary resilience; resilience framework; high-rise building; matter-element extension theory of entropy weight; resilience evaluation grade
467
0
0