基于性能试验的实验室排风柜变风量控制系统研究
摘要：通过试验的方法，对目前3种最常用的排风柜变风量控制方式的面风速、响应时间、稳态时间及示踪气体泄漏率等性能进行研究，并对试验数据进行对比和分析，结果表明，3种不同控制方式均能很好地控制排风柜面风速，但在响应时间、稳态时间及示踪气体泄漏率方面存在明显差异。“位移传感器与文丘里阀”组合变风量控制系统的综合性能较“位移传感器与文丘里蝶阀”组合变风量控制系统更优，柜内污染物泄漏浓度更低。“面风速传感器与蝶阀”组合变风量控制系统的响应时间和稳态时间最长，柜内污染物泄漏风险最高。
关键词：排风柜实验室变风量控制系统性能试验闭环控制开环控制复合控制
尊敬的用户，本篇文章需要2元，点击支付交费后阅读
限时优惠福利：领取VIP会员
全年期刊、VIP视频免费!
全年期刊、VIP视频免费!
参考文献[1] 李智超.南京某大学实验室通风系统设计[J].暖通空调，2021,51(10):104- 109.
[2] 夏本明.变风量控制系统在化学实验室暖通空调系统中的应用[J].暖通空调，2022,52(9):115- 121,114.
[3] ANSI/AIHA.Laboratory ventilation:ANSI/AIHA Z9.5-2012[S].Virginia:AIHA,2012.
[4] European Committee for Standardization.Fume cupboards:part 3:type test methods:EN 14175-3:2019[S].Brussels:CEN,2019:6- 10.
[5] ASHRAE.Methods of testing performance of laboratory fume hoods:ANSI/ASHRAE 110-2016[S].Atlantic:ASHRAE Inc.,2016.
[6] ZHANG Z,AGARWAL J K.Continuous monitoring of fume hood face velocity with a side wall sensor[G]//ASHRAE.ASHRAE transactions1993:part(1).Atlanta:ASHRAE Inc.,1993:459.
[7] 王婷婷，刘东，程勇，等.实验室排风柜面风速测试方法的对比研究及实验验证[J].建筑热能通风空调，2013,32(2):15- 19.
[8] U.S.Environmental Protection Agency.Performance requirements for laboratory fume hoods:EPA-2018[S].Washington:EPA,2018:39- 40.
[2] 夏本明.变风量控制系统在化学实验室暖通空调系统中的应用[J].暖通空调，2022,52(9):115- 121,114.
[3] ANSI/AIHA.Laboratory ventilation:ANSI/AIHA Z9.5-2012[S].Virginia:AIHA,2012.
[4] European Committee for Standardization.Fume cupboards:part 3:type test methods:EN 14175-3:2019[S].Brussels:CEN,2019:6- 10.
[5] ASHRAE.Methods of testing performance of laboratory fume hoods:ANSI/ASHRAE 110-2016[S].Atlantic:ASHRAE Inc.,2016.
[6] ZHANG Z,AGARWAL J K.Continuous monitoring of fume hood face velocity with a side wall sensor[G]//ASHRAE.ASHRAE transactions1993:part(1).Atlanta:ASHRAE Inc.,1993:459.
[7] 王婷婷，刘东，程勇，等.实验室排风柜面风速测试方法的对比研究及实验验证[J].建筑热能通风空调，2013,32(2):15- 19.
[8] U.S.Environmental Protection Agency.Performance requirements for laboratory fume hoods:EPA-2018[S].Washington:EPA,2018:39- 40.
Research on variable air volume control systems of laboratory fume hoods based on performance test
Abstract: In this paper, the performance of the three most commonly used variable air volume(VAV) control methods for fume hoods, such as face velocity control, response time, steady time and tracer gas containment, is studied through test methods, and the test data is compared and analysed. The results show that the three different control methods can effectively control the face velocity of the fume hood, but there are obvious differences in response time, steady time and tracer gas containment. The comprehensive performance of the VAV control system with the combination of the displacement sensor and Venturi valve is better than that of the VAV control system with the combination of the displacement sensor and Venturi butterfly damper, and the leakage concentration of pollutants in the hood is lower. The VAV control system with the combination of face velocity sensor and butterfly damper has the longest response time and steady time, and the highest risk of pollutant leakage in the hood.
Keywords: fume hood; laboratory; variable air volume(VAV) control system; performance test; closed-loop control; open-loop control; compound control;
534
0
0