中欧抗震设计规范关于地震作用计算参数的比较与换算

引用文献：

张春华周小龙李元松邹灵玥. 中欧抗震设计规范关于地震作用计算参数的比较与换算[J]. 建筑结构，2022，48（08）：66-73.

ZHANG Chunhua ZHOU Xiaolong LI Yuansong ZOU Lingyue. Comparison and conversion among calculation parameters of earthquake actions between Chinese and European seismic design codes[J]. Building Structure，2022,48（08）：66-73.

作者：张春华周小龙李元松邹灵玥

单位：中交第二公路勘察设计研究院有限公司武汉工程大学土木工程与建筑学院筑博设计股份有限公司

摘要：首先介绍了欧洲抗震设计标准Design of structures for earthquake resistance(简称欧标)和中国《建筑抗震设计规范》(GB 50011—2010)(2016年版)(简称中规)的抗震设防目标与实现方法，并进行了简单对比，分析了抗震设防目标与地震超越概率的关系。然后基于设计基准期和地震事件发生概率模型，建立了不同超越概率条件下中规和欧标地震动峰值加速度间的相互转换关系式，系统地分析了反应谱主要影响因素及参数的取值方法和相互联系，此外通过工程算例对比分析了中规和欧标在相同外部地震环境下楼层水平地震作用计算结果的差异。结果表明：中规和欧标反应谱理论本质上相同，形式相似，但地震动参数取值方法和依据存在差异；在相同外部地震环境下，依据欧标获得的楼层水平地震作用大于基于中规获得的计算结果，但二者差值百分比分布稳定，具有较好的规律性和可比性。

关键词：抗震设计规范，地震作用，超越概率，反应谱，地震动参数

作者简介：张春华，学士，教授级高级工程师，主要从事桥梁、建筑设计、欧美工程标准对比等相关工作，Email:cucy@foxmail.com。*周小龙，博士，副教授，主要从事工程结构抗震与防灾减灾研究，Email:zhouxiaolong@cqu.edu.cn。

基金：国家出版基金项目(20180686)；武汉工程大学科学研究基金项目(K201737)。

尊敬的用户，本篇文章需要2元，点击支付交费后阅读

限时优惠福利：领取VIP会员
全年期刊、会议视频
全部免费！培训视频打折！

参考文献[1] 郁银泉，董庆园，王喆.中美日钢框架结构抗震设计规定比较(Ⅰ):一般设计规定 [J].建筑结构，2016,46(19):1-7.
[2] 罗开海，王亚勇.中美欧抗震设计规范地震动参数换算关系的研究 [J].建筑结构，2006,36(8):103-107.
[3] 张桂铭，刘文锋.中、美、欧、日抗震规范对比 [J].建筑结构，2014,44(19):61-66,25.
[4] 官贞珍，朱全军，樊习英，等.中美欧电气设备抗震设计规范研究 [J].地震工程与工程振动，2018,38(3):184-193.
[5] 蒋志楠，张桂欣，李晶.中、美、欧抗震规范底部剪力法的对比研究 [J].震灾防御技术，2018,13(3):534-551.
[6] 李宗文，马建勋，马鸿敏，等.中、欧、日建筑抗震设计规范相关规定的比较 [J].建筑结构，2018,48(S1):325-328.
[7] 建筑抗震设计规范：GB 50011—2010 [S].2016年版.北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2016.
[8] Eurocode 8:Design of structures for earthquake resistance:BS EN 1998-5:2004[S].Brussels:Comite Europeen De Normalisation,2004.
[9] FARDIS M,CARVALHO E,ELNASHAI A,et al.Designer’s guide to EN 1998-1 and EN 1998-5 Eurocode 8:design of structures for earthquake resistance [M].Great Britain:Thomas Telford,2005.
[10] 洪峰，谢礼立.工程结构抗震设计中小震、中震和大震的确定方法 [J].地震工程与工程振动，2000,20(2):1-6.

Comparison and conversion among calculation parameters of earthquake actions between Chinese and European seismic design codes

ZHANG Chunhua ZHOU Xiaolong LI Yuansong ZOU Lingyue

(CCCC Second Highway Consultants Co., Ltd. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan Institute of Technology Zhubo Design Co., Ltd.)

Abstract: Firstly, the seismic fortification target and realization method of the European seismic design standard Design of structures for earthquake resistance(for short European standard)and the Chinese Code for seismic design of buildings(GB 50011—2010)( 2016 edition)(for short Chinese code)were introduced, and a simple comparison was made, and the relationship between the seismic fortification target and the exceeding probability of earthquake was analyzed. Then, based on the design reference period and the occurrence probability model of seismic events, the inter-conversion relations between the peak acceleration of seismic ground motion of the Chinese code and European standard under different exceeding probability were established, and the main influencing factors of the reaction spectrum and the value method and correlation of the parameters were systematically analyzed. The difference of the calculation results of the story horizontal earthquake action of the Chinese code and European standard in the same external earthquake environment was analyzed and compared by a engineering example. The results show that the response spectrum theory of Chinese code and European standard have the same essence and similarity form, but method and basis of selecting ground motion parameter are difference. In the same external earthquake environment, the story horizontal earthquake action according to European standard is greater than the calculated results based on Chinese code, but the percentage of differences between calculation results is stable, with good regularity and comparability.

Keywords: seismic design code; earthquake action; exceeding probability; response spectra; ground motion parameter

478 0 0