采用缓粘结预应力筋的新型抗拔桩受力特性研究

引用文献:

毛宗原 郭豪 张宏刚 高识涵 陈穆. 采用缓粘结预应力筋的新型抗拔桩受力特性研究[J]. 建筑结构,2023,48(03):138-145.

MAO Zongyuan GUO Hao ZHANG Honggang GAO Shihan CHEN Mu. Study on mechanical characteristics of new type of uplift pile with gently bonded prestressed reinforcement[J]. Building Structure,2023,48(03):138-145.

作者:毛宗原 郭豪 张宏刚 高识涵 陈穆
单位:中国建筑技术集团有限公司 北京城市副中心站综合枢纽建设管理有限公司
摘要:介绍了一种采用缓粘结预应力筋的新型抗拔桩,对该新型抗拔桩的施工工艺进行了总结,并且通过现场试验对比分析了无粘结预应力抗拔桩和缓粘结预应力抗拔桩的荷载变形特性、受力机理和桩身裂缝分布。试验结果表明:缓粘结预应力抗拔桩的单桩承载力比无粘结预应力抗拔桩提高了3.7%~26.7%,并且其顶部位移满足一般建筑物的抗浮要求;无粘结预应力抗拔桩在试验过程中桩身整体先处于受拉状态,当荷载大于预应力时,抗拔桩从下部桩身开始呈现受压状态,缓粘结预应力抗拔桩在试验过程中桩身整体处于受拉状态,并且下部桩身为主要受力部位,抗拔桩受力效果较好;两种试桩在试验过程中桩身未出现裂缝;与无粘结预应力抗拔桩相比,缓粘结预应力抗拔桩有更好的整体性,能够有效防止由于钢绞线变形导致抗拔桩与承台锚固部位产生裂缝,保证桩顶钢绞线与外部隔离,防止钢绞线产生锈蚀。
关键词:无粘结预应力;缓粘结预应力;抗拔桩;单桩静载荷试验;
作者简介:毛宗原,硕士,教授级高级工程师,注册土木工程师(岩土),主要从事岩土工程勘察、基坑与地基基础方面的研究、设计与施工工作,Email:1393304269@qq.com。郭豪,硕士,助理工程师,主要从事岩土工程勘察、设计工作,Email:2383438991@qq.com。
基金:国家自然科学基金重大项目(52090081)。
尊敬的用户,本篇文章需要2元,点击支付交费后阅读
参考文献[1] 管昕昉.压力分散型锚杆工作机理的试验研究及数值模拟[D].济南:山东建筑大学,2018.
[2] 赵晓光.无粘结后张预应力抗拔灌注桩的试验研究[D].北京:中国建筑科学研究院,2012.
[3] 张明,蓝永基,丘华生,等.无黏结预应力施工技术在大吨位抗拔桩中的应用[J].施工技术,2011,40(18):22-25.
[4] 杜毛毛,苏小卒,赵勇.预应力钢绞线粘结性能试验研究综述[J].结构工程师,2008,24(3):140-144.
[5] 肖启晟,熊学玉.缓黏结预应力筋拉拔试验细观数值模拟[J].工业建筑,2021,51(10):28-32,39.
[6] 冯新,周先雁.缓粘结预应力钢绞线的试验研究[J].公路,2011(10):67-70.
[7] 黄毅,马林,潘则名,等.缓黏结预应力锚具的研究与设计[J].铁道建筑,2019,59(10):54-56,64.
[8] 王德才,王德亮,周胜利,等.缓黏结预应力在竖向及平面工程结构中的应用[J].施工技术,2015,44(S1):486-487.
[9] 马柯佳,徐建设.缓粘结预应力技术研究及应用综述[J].四川建筑科学研究,2020,46(3):58-63.
[10] 李静.大直径缓粘结预应力技术及应用的研究[J].江西建材,2021,41(8):179-182.
[11] 建筑基桩检测技术规范:JGJ 106—2014[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2014.
[12] 建筑桩基技术规范:JGJ 94—2008[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2008.
Study on mechanical characteristics of new type of uplift pile with gently bonded prestressed reinforcement
MAO Zongyuan GUO Hao ZHANG Honggang GAO Shihan CHEN Mu
(China Building Technique Group Co., Ltd. Beijing Sub-central Station Comprehensive Hub Construction Management Co., Ltd.)
Abstract: A new type of uplift pile with gently bonded prestressed reinforcement was introduced. The construction technology of this new type of uplift pile was summarized, and the load deformation characteristics, stress mechanism, pile crack distribution of unbonded prestress uplift pile and gently bonded prestressed uplift pile were analyzed through field tests. The test results show that the single pile bearing capacity of gently bonded prestressed uplift pile is 3.7%~26.7% higher than that of unbonded prestressed uplift pile, and its top displacement meets the anti-floating requirements of general buildings. During the test process, the unbonded prestressed uplift pile is in a tensile state as a whole at frist. When the load is greater than the prestress, the uplift pile begins to be in a compressive state from the lower pile body. In the test process, the whole pile body of gently bond prestress is in the tensile state, and the lower pile body is the main bearing part, so the froce effect of the uplift pile is better. No cracks appear in the pile body of the two kinds of test piles in the test process. Compared with unbonded prestress uplift pile, the gently bonded prestress uplift pile has better integrity, which can effectively prevent the cracks in the anchor position between the prestress uplift pile and the pile cap caused by the deformation of the steel strands, ensure the isolation of the steel strands at the top of the pile from the outside and prevent the corrosion of the steel strands.
Keywords: unbonded prestress; gently bond prestress; uplift pile; single pile static load test
591 0 0
文字:     A-     A+     默认 取消