粤港澳规范高层建筑结构抗风计算对比分析

引用文献:

仇建磊 孙凌志 李庆祥 马扬 许伟 肖丹玲. 粤港澳规范高层建筑结构抗风计算对比分析[J]. 建筑结构,2022,48(08):27-35,26.

QIU Jianlei SUN Lingzhi LI Qingxiang MA Yang XU Wei XIAO Danling. Comparative analysis of wind-resistance calculation of high-rise building structures in Guangdong,Hong Kong and Macao code[J]. Building Structure,2022,48(08):27-35,26.

作者:仇建磊 孙凌志 李庆祥 马扬 许伟 肖丹玲
单位:广东省建筑科学研究院集团股份有限公司
摘要:鉴于粤港澳地区建筑结构抗风规范存在差异大、不兼容的问题,就典型高层建筑结构抗风计算方法进行对比分析,并结合风洞试验结果得出各规范在风荷载及荷载效应方面的宽严程度。结果表明:粤港澳抗风规范风荷载计算基本风压取值参数不同,取值方式及大小、影响因素的理论背景等也有不同程度的差异,按照广东规范B类地貌计算所得风荷载与香港规范基本相当,澳门规范风荷载计算结果最大;广东规范主要以层间位移角为结构风致位移控制目标,香港规范和澳门规范除了层间位移角,还对结构整体水平位移进行限制;在结构风振舒适度方面,只有广东规范和香港规范对此进行了考虑,但其影响因素和宽严程度存在一定差异;粤港澳规范在风致结构水平位移方面的严格程度大致为:澳门规范>广东规范>香港规范,在风振加速度方面,广东规范严格程度要高于香港规范。
关键词:粤港澳规范,高层结构,抗风设计,规范对比
作者简介:仇建磊,博士,主要从事结构抗风及抗震性能分析研究工作,Email:qiu_jianlei@qq.com。*李庆祥,博士,教授级高级工程师,一级注册结构工程师,主要从事结构风工程研究工作,Email:lqxwind@163.com。
基金:
尊敬的用户,本篇文章需要2元,点击支付交费后阅读
参考文献[1] 黄本才,汪丛军.结构抗风分析原理及应用[M].2版.上海:同济大学出版社,2008.
[2] 周云.结构风振控制的设计方法与应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.
[3] 建筑结构荷载规范:DBJ 015-101—2014[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,中国城市出版社,2014.
[4] 建筑结构荷载规范:GB 50009—2012[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2012.
[5] Code of practice on wind effects in Hong Kong 2019[S].香港:屋宇署,2019.
[6] Explanatory notes to code of practice on wind effects in Hong Kong 2019[S].香港:屋宇署,2019.
[7] 香港风力效应作业守则2004年[S].香港:屋宇署,2004.
[8] 香港风力效应作业守则2004年说明资料[S].香港:屋宇署,2004.
[9] 屋宇结构及桥梁结构之安全及荷载规章[S].澳门:澳门特别行政区政府,1996.
[10] 高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程:DBJ 15-92—2013[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2013.
[11] 钢结构设计规程:DBJ 15-102—2014 [S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2014.
[12] 混凝土结构作业守则2013 [S].香港:屋宇署,2013.
[13] 钢结构作业守则2011[S].香港:屋宇署,2011.
[14] 钢筋混凝土及预应力混凝土结构规章[S].澳门:澳门特别行政区政府,1996.
[15] 建筑钢结构规章[S].澳门:澳门特别行政区政府,2001.
[16] Bases for design of structures-serviceability of buildings and walkways against vibrations:ISO 10137[S].International Standard Organisation (ISO),2007.
[17] 建筑工程风洞试验方法标准:JGJ/T 338—2014[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.
Comparative analysis of wind-resistance calculation of high-rise building structures in Guangdong,Hong Kong and Macao code
QIU Jianlei SUN Lingzhi LI Qingxiang MA Yang XU Wei XIAO Danling
(Guangdong Provincial Academy of Building Research Group Co., Ltd.)
Abstract: In view of the differences and compatibility of wind-resistance design codes for buildings in Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao, the wind resistance calculation methods of typical high-rise building structures in these codes were compared and analyzed, in which the leniency of wind loads and load effects of each code were carried out by wind tunnel tests. The results show that the basic wind pressure in wind resistance design codes of Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao are different as well as their theoretical background, calculation method and influence factors. The wind load calculated according to Guangdong code for exposure category B is basically equivalent to which calculated regarding to Hong Kong code, while the calculation result of Macao code is the largest. Guangdong code mainly takes lateral drifts as the criteria of estimating wind-induced displacement while Hongkong code and Macau code not only provide limitation on story drift, but also on displacement. Only Guangdong code and Hong Kong code consider the structural wind-vibration comfort, there are certain differences in influencing factors and the degree of leniency. The stringency of the limitation in lateral drifts among these three codes roughly follows the order of: Macao code > Guangdong code > Hongkong code. In terms of wind-vibration acceleration, Guangdong code is stricter than Hong Kong code.
Keywords: Guangdong,Hong Kong and Macao code; high-rise building structure; wind-resistance design; comparison of code
467 0 0
文字:     A-     A+     默认 取消