预制混凝土叠合楼板新型连接构造的力学性能研究
引用文献：
张敏 秦稳 卢旦 陈宜虎 潘丹. 预制混凝土叠合楼板新型连接构造的力学性能研究[J]. 建筑结构，2022，48（06）：26-31，130.
ZHANG Min QIN Wen LU Dan CHEN Yihu PAN Dan. Research on mechanical properties of prefabricated concrete composite floor with new connection[J]. Building Structure，2022,48（06）：26-31，130.
摘要：对四个采用不同连接构造装配制作的预制混凝土叠合板试件进行单调静力加载试验，研究试件的破坏形态、承载极限等力学性能，并进行有限元分析。结果表明：各试件均经历弹性阶段、弹塑性阶段及破坏阶段，属于延性破坏，试件承载力均达到设计预期，与现浇试件理论计算的承载力相当；所有试件的破坏位置均出现在连接区域之外的断面，并非在跨中位置，实现了节点处“强连接”的目标；钢筋U型连接以及侧面开槽封闭环筋搭接连接构造的钢筋均能实现有效锚固；叠合板的预制层可与后浇层协同工作。
关键词：预制混凝土叠合楼板，新型连接，静力加载试验，数值分析，破坏形态
基金：国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0701902-4)；广西自然科学基金资助项目(2018GXNSFAA050145)。
尊敬的用户，本篇文章需要2元，点击支付交费后阅读
限时优惠福利：领取VIP会员
全年期刊、会议视频
全部免费！培训视频打折！
全年期刊、会议视频
全部免费！培训视频打折！
参考文献[1] 装配式混凝土结构技术规程：JGJ 1—2014 [S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2014.
[2] 装配式混凝土结构连接节点构造：G 310-1～2 [S].北京：中国计划出版社，2015.
[3] 谷明旺.对国内装配式建筑生产工艺和安装方法的再认识(二)[J].住宅与房地产，2018(12):70-74.
[4] THANOON W A,YARDIN Y,JAAFAR M S,et al.Structural behaviour of ferrocement-brick composite floor slab panel[J].Construction and Building Materials,2010,24 (11):2224-2230.
[5] REX C O,EASTERLING W S.Behavior and modeling of reinforced composite slab in tenison[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2000,126(7):764-771.
[6] HYUNG KEUN RYUA,YOUNG JIN KIMB,SUNG PIL CHANGA.Crack control of a continuous composite two-girder bridge with prefabricated slabs under static and fatigue loads[J].Engineering Structures 2007,29 (6)851-864.
[7] YE XIANGUO,YANG KAINAN,CHONG XUN.Experimental study on properties of side joint between superimposed slabs with lattice steel bars[J].Advanced Materials Research,2014,3489(1278):109-114.
[8] JEONG Y J.Simplified model to predict partial interactive structural performance of steel-concrete composite slabs[J].Journal of Construction Research,2007,64(2):238-246.
[9] 颜峰，高杰，田春雨，等.带接缝的混凝土叠合楼板足尺试验研究[J].建筑结构，2016,46(10):56-60.
[10] 章雪峰，郑曙光，单玉川，等.四边不出筋密拼连接叠合双向板足尺试验研究[J].建筑结构，2019,49(15):83-87.
[11] 刘运林.双向叠合楼板拼缝处受力机理试验研究与数值模拟[D].合肥：合肥工业大学，2014:58-87.
[12] 叶献国，华和贵，徐天爽，等.叠合板拼接构造的试验研究[J].工业建筑，2010,40(1):59-62.
[13] 余泳涛，赵勇，高志强.单缝密拼钢筋混凝土叠合板受弯性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报，2019,40(4):29-37.
[14] 恽燕春，陈鹏，王柏生，等.密拼叠合楼板受力性能研究[J].施工技术，2018,47(12):75-79.
[15] 混凝土结构试验方法标准：GB/T 50152—2012 [S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2012.
[16] 混凝土结构设计规范：GB 50010—2010 [S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2011.
[17] 张劲，王庆扬，胡守营，等.ABAQUS混凝土损伤塑性模型参数验证[J].建筑结构，2008,38(8):127-130.
[2] 装配式混凝土结构连接节点构造：G 310-1～2 [S].北京：中国计划出版社，2015.
[3] 谷明旺.对国内装配式建筑生产工艺和安装方法的再认识(二)[J].住宅与房地产，2018(12):70-74.
[4] THANOON W A,YARDIN Y,JAAFAR M S,et al.Structural behaviour of ferrocement-brick composite floor slab panel[J].Construction and Building Materials,2010,24 (11):2224-2230.
[5] REX C O,EASTERLING W S.Behavior and modeling of reinforced composite slab in tenison[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2000,126(7):764-771.
[6] HYUNG KEUN RYUA,YOUNG JIN KIMB,SUNG PIL CHANGA.Crack control of a continuous composite two-girder bridge with prefabricated slabs under static and fatigue loads[J].Engineering Structures 2007,29 (6)851-864.
[7] YE XIANGUO,YANG KAINAN,CHONG XUN.Experimental study on properties of side joint between superimposed slabs with lattice steel bars[J].Advanced Materials Research,2014,3489(1278):109-114.
[8] JEONG Y J.Simplified model to predict partial interactive structural performance of steel-concrete composite slabs[J].Journal of Construction Research,2007,64(2):238-246.
[9] 颜峰，高杰，田春雨，等.带接缝的混凝土叠合楼板足尺试验研究[J].建筑结构，2016,46(10):56-60.
[10] 章雪峰，郑曙光，单玉川，等.四边不出筋密拼连接叠合双向板足尺试验研究[J].建筑结构，2019,49(15):83-87.
[11] 刘运林.双向叠合楼板拼缝处受力机理试验研究与数值模拟[D].合肥：合肥工业大学，2014:58-87.
[12] 叶献国，华和贵，徐天爽，等.叠合板拼接构造的试验研究[J].工业建筑，2010,40(1):59-62.
[13] 余泳涛，赵勇，高志强.单缝密拼钢筋混凝土叠合板受弯性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报，2019,40(4):29-37.
[14] 恽燕春，陈鹏，王柏生，等.密拼叠合楼板受力性能研究[J].施工技术，2018,47(12):75-79.
[15] 混凝土结构试验方法标准：GB/T 50152—2012 [S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2012.
[16] 混凝土结构设计规范：GB 50010—2010 [S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2011.
[17] 张劲，王庆扬，胡守营，等.ABAQUS混凝土损伤塑性模型参数验证[J].建筑结构，2008,38(8):127-130.
Research on mechanical properties of prefabricated concrete composite floor with new connection
Abstract: The monotonic static loading test was carried out on four prefabricated concrete composite slab specimens assembled with different connection structures, and the mechanical properties such as the failure form and bearing limit of the specimen were studied and finite element analysis was carried out. The results show that each specimen has undergone an elastic stage, an elastoplastic stage and a failure stage, which belong to the ductile failure. The bearing capacity of the specimen has reached the design expectation, which is equivalent to the theoretical calculation of the cast-in-place specimen. The damage position of all specimens appear on the cross section outside the connection area, not at the mid-span position, achieve the goal of “strong connection” at the node. The steel bar U-shaped connection and the steel bar with the side slotted closed ring bar lap connection structure can achieve effective anchorage. The prefabricated layer of the laminated board can work with the post-cast layer.
Keywords: prefabricated concrete composite floor; new connection; static loading test; numerical analysis; failure mode
603
0
0