永久位移型地震动对建筑隔震设计影响初探

引用文献:

李艳华, 宋廷苏, 王林建, 刘观. 永久位移型地震动对建筑隔震设计影响初探[J]. 建筑结构,2023,48(11):110-115,102.

LI Yanhua SONG Tingsu WANG Linjian LIU Guan. Preliminary study on influence of ground motion with permanent displacement on building seismic isolation design[J]. Building Structure,2023,48(11):110-115,102.

作者:李艳华, 宋廷苏, 王林建, 刘观
单位:深圳防灾减灾技术研究院 云南省地震局
摘要:以自振周期大于2s的某实际钢结构建筑为研究对象,分别在设防地震和罕遇地震下,输入含与不含永久位移型地震动,分别计算得到隔震结构和非隔震结构的非线性地震反应。通过对比含与不含永久位移型地震动作用下的上部结构地震反应,进而分析永久位移对该类型建筑隔震设计的影响。结果表明:无论地震动输入是否含永久位移,与非隔震结构相比,隔震结构的层间剪力和倾覆力矩均显著降低,且降低幅度随着楼层的升高而增大;在含永久位移型地震动与不含永久位移型地震动分别作用下,各楼层层间剪力比值与倾覆力矩比值无明显差别,比值基本在1左右;在两类地震动作用下,计算得到的减震系数差别不超过10%;在两类地震动作用下,隔震层支座平均最大拉、压应力及位移相差不大,永久位移型地震动作用的放大效应不明显。
关键词:长周期结构;钢结构;永久位移;隔震设计;
作者简介:李艳华,硕士,主要从事减隔震产品研发、减隔震建筑结构设计、减隔震技术研究与应用,Email:1042082629@qq.com。宋廷苏,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事减隔震技术研究与应用、近断层强震特性、场地效应等方面工作,Email:15808859649@163.com。
基金:中国地震局地震科技星火计划项目(XH19071);中国地震局地震科技星火计划项目(XH20086);深圳市可持续发展科技专项(KCXFZ202002011010039);广东省省级科技计划项目(2018B020208003)。
尊敬的用户,本篇文章需要2元,点击支付交费后阅读
参考文献[1] 崔进,朱以媛.浅谈减隔震技术原理及优缺点[J].建材发展导向,2021,19(20):96-98.
[2] 刘大路,潘文,赖正聪,等.某地震高烈度区多项不规则高层结构隔震设计[J].建筑技术,2021,52(10):1224-1227.
[3] 顾龙威,任超.高烈度区框架结构隔震设计分析[J].四川建材,2021,47(10):72-73.
[4] 付仰强,张同亿.某医疗钢结构隔震设计与性能分析[J].建筑结构,2021,51(18):92-97.
[5] 李家玮,兰飞,陈龙富.现代建筑工程中隔震支座技术运用探究[J].智能建筑与智慧城市,2020(11):70-71.
[6] 高旭军.大直径铅芯橡胶隔震支座在教学楼中的应用[J].居舍,2020(16):31-32,80.
[7] 崔进,朱以媛.浅谈减隔震技术原理及优缺点[J].建材发展导向,2021,19(20):96-98.
[8] 屈涛,卫文,古静欣.某学院楼减隔震方案比选与设计[J].建筑结构,2022,52(21):139-143.
[9] 刘爱娟,崔玉龙,刘铁新.考虑动态临界加速度的地震边坡永久位移预测模型研究[J].地震工程学报,2021,43(2):445-452.
[10] 徐国林,戚海鳌,张亚飞,等.地震动永久位移对结构地震反应影响[J].地震学报,2020,42(4):482-490.
[11] 周宝峰,于海英,温瑞智,等.一种识别永久位移的新方法[J].土木工程学报,2013,46(S2):135-140.
Preliminary study on influence of ground motion with permanent displacement on building seismic isolation design
LI Yanhua SONG Tingsu WANG Linjian LIU Guan
(Shenzhen Academy of Disaster Prevention and Reduction Yunnan Earthquake Agency)
Abstract: A practical steel structure building with natural vibration period greater than 2s was taken as the research object. Under the fortification earthquake and rare earthquake, the nonlinear seismic response of isolated structure and non-isolated structure was calculated subjected to the ground motion with and without permanent displacement respectively. By comparing the seismic response of superstructure under the ground motion with and without permanent displacement, the influence of ground motion with permanent displacement on the seismic isolation design of this type of building was analyzed. The results show that: whether the ground motion contains permanent displacement or not, the inter-story shear force and overturning moment of the isolated structure are greatly reduced compared with the non-isolated structure, and the seismic isolation effect increases with the increase of the floor; subjected to ground motions with and without permanent displacement, there is no significant difference between the shear ratio and overturning moment ratio of each floor, and the ratio is basically about 1; under the action of two kinds of ground motions, the difference of calculated damping coefficient is no more than 10%; subjected to two kinds of ground motions, the average maximum tensile and compressive stress and displacement of the seismic isolators are similar, and the amplification effect of permanent displacement is not obvious.
Keywords: long period structure; steel structure; permanent displacement; seismic isolation design
496 0 0
文字:     A-     A+     默认 取消