国产Q460高强钢焊接T形截面轴心压杆整体稳定承载力研究
引用文献：
熊晓莉 都坤 马萌. 国产Q460高强钢焊接T形截面轴心压杆整体稳定承载力研究[J]. 建筑结构，2023，48（10）：62-66，121.
XIONG Xiaoli DU Kun MA Meng. Research on overall stability bearing capacity of domestic Q460 high strength steel welded T-section columns under axial compression[J]. Building Structure，2023,48（10）：62-66，121.
摘要：为了研究国产Q460高强钢焊接T形截面轴心压杆的整体稳定承载力，用厚度为8mm和12mm的国产Q460高强度钢板制作了3根焊接T形截面试件进行轴心受压试验。基于实测的钢材力学性能、截面残余应力和试件几何尺寸，建立考虑了初始几何缺陷和力学缺陷的有限元模型，分析预测试件的极限承载力，并将有限元结果与试验结果进行对比，验证有限元分析方法的正确性。利用经试验验证的有限元分析方法，补充计算了24根不同长细比压杆的整体稳定极限承载力，将相应的整体稳定系数与《钢结构设计标准》(GB 50017—2017)中的柱子稳定系数曲线进行比较。研究表明，国产Q460高强钢焊接T形截面轴心压杆的整体失稳形式为绕对称轴的弯扭失稳，失稳时压杆进入了弹塑性变形阶段，在设计过程中选取b类截面柱子曲线对其进行计算是安全可靠的。
关键词：高强钢；焊接T形截面；轴心压杆；整体稳定；极限承载力；有限元分析；
基金：国家自然科学基金(51308194)。
尊敬的用户，本篇文章需要2元，点击支付交费后阅读
限时优惠福利：领取VIP会员
全年期刊、会议视频
全部免费！培训视频打折！
全年期刊、会议视频
全部免费！培训视频打折！
参考文献[1] 施刚，班慧勇，石永久，等.高强度钢材钢结构研究进展综述[J].工程力学，2013,30(1):1-13.
[2] CAO XIANLEI,GU LIXIANG,KONG ZHENGYI,et al.Local buckling of 800MPa high strength steel welded T-section columns under axial compression[J].Engineering Structures,2019,194:196-206.
[3] BAN HUIYONG,SHI GANG,SHI YONGJIU,et al.Overall buckling behavior of 460MPa high strength steel columns:experimental investigation and design method[J].Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2012,74(4):140-150.
[4] 周锋，陈以一，童乐为，等.高强度钢材焊接H形构件受力性能的试验研究[J].工业建筑，2012,42(1):32-36.
[5] 李国强，王彦博，陈素文.高强钢焊接箱形柱轴心受压极限承载力试验研究[J].建筑结构学报，2012,33(3):8-14.
[6] 王彦博，李国强，陈素文，等.Q460钢焊接H形柱轴心受压极限承载力试验研究[J].土木工程学报，2012,45(6):58-64.
[7] 钢及钢产品力学性能试验取样位置及试样制备：GB/T 2975—2018[S].北京：中国标准出版社，2018.
[8] 金属材料拉伸试验第1部分：室温试验方法：GB/T 228.1—2010[S].北京：中国标准出版社，2011.
[9] 高松贞.Q460高强钢焊接T形截面压杆残余应力试验研究[D].郑州：河南工业大学，2017.
[10] 王田.Q460高强度钢材焊接T形截面残余应力分布研究[D].郑州：河南工业大学，2020.
[11] 熊晓莉，王田，马萌，等.一种钢压杆扭转缺陷测量装置：CN209857830U[P].2019-12-27.
[12] 熊晓莉，袁光，李建光，等.一种H形截面钢压杆初始几何缺陷的测量方法：CN110686632A[P].2020-01-14.
[13] 邓长根，应武挡，崔凡承.焊接H形截面纯弯钢构件弹塑性局部相关屈曲分析[J].建筑结构，2017,47(13):20-25.
[14] 熊晓莉，庞瑞.剖分T型钢压杆整体失稳问题研究[J].建筑结构，2013,43(13):58-62.
[15] 丁阳，郭鹏.高强钢焊接工字梁整体稳定性能分析[J].建筑结构，2015,45(21):25-29.
[2] CAO XIANLEI,GU LIXIANG,KONG ZHENGYI,et al.Local buckling of 800MPa high strength steel welded T-section columns under axial compression[J].Engineering Structures,2019,194:196-206.
[3] BAN HUIYONG,SHI GANG,SHI YONGJIU,et al.Overall buckling behavior of 460MPa high strength steel columns:experimental investigation and design method[J].Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2012,74(4):140-150.
[4] 周锋，陈以一，童乐为，等.高强度钢材焊接H形构件受力性能的试验研究[J].工业建筑，2012,42(1):32-36.
[5] 李国强，王彦博，陈素文.高强钢焊接箱形柱轴心受压极限承载力试验研究[J].建筑结构学报，2012,33(3):8-14.
[6] 王彦博，李国强，陈素文，等.Q460钢焊接H形柱轴心受压极限承载力试验研究[J].土木工程学报，2012,45(6):58-64.
[7] 钢及钢产品力学性能试验取样位置及试样制备：GB/T 2975—2018[S].北京：中国标准出版社，2018.
[8] 金属材料拉伸试验第1部分：室温试验方法：GB/T 228.1—2010[S].北京：中国标准出版社，2011.
[9] 高松贞.Q460高强钢焊接T形截面压杆残余应力试验研究[D].郑州：河南工业大学，2017.
[10] 王田.Q460高强度钢材焊接T形截面残余应力分布研究[D].郑州：河南工业大学，2020.
[11] 熊晓莉，王田，马萌，等.一种钢压杆扭转缺陷测量装置：CN209857830U[P].2019-12-27.
[12] 熊晓莉，袁光，李建光，等.一种H形截面钢压杆初始几何缺陷的测量方法：CN110686632A[P].2020-01-14.
[13] 邓长根，应武挡，崔凡承.焊接H形截面纯弯钢构件弹塑性局部相关屈曲分析[J].建筑结构，2017,47(13):20-25.
[14] 熊晓莉，庞瑞.剖分T型钢压杆整体失稳问题研究[J].建筑结构，2013,43(13):58-62.
[15] 丁阳，郭鹏.高强钢焊接工字梁整体稳定性能分析[J].建筑结构，2015,45(21):25-29.
Research on overall stability bearing capacity of domestic Q460 high strength steel welded T-section columns under axial compression
Abstract: In order to study the overall stability capacity of domestic Q460 high strength steel welded T-section columns under axial compression, three T-section columns were welded with 8mm-thick and 12mm-thick Q460 high strength steel plates made in China were made for axial compression test. The finite element models were built up according to measured mechanical properties of steel, section residual stress and measured sizes of members. And residual stress and initial geometric imperfection were considered in the finite element models to analyze and predict the ultimate bearing capacity of the columns. The finite element results were compared with the experimental results to verify the correctness of the finite element analysis method. Based on the finite element analysis method verified by experiment, the overall stable ultimate bearing capacity of 24 different slenderness columns were calculated and compared with column stability coefficient curves in Standard for design of steel structures(GB 50017—2017). The study shows that the overall instability form of domestic Q460 high strength steel welded T-section columns was bending and torsional around the symmetry axis, and the compression columns enter the elastic-plastic deformation stage when the instability occurs. It is safe and reliable to select the stability coefficient curve of the type b columns to calculate in the design process.
Keywords: high strength steel; welded T-section; axial compression column; overall stability; ultimate bearing capacity; finite element analysis
504
0
0