圆台形钢管混凝土短柱轴压性能研究

引用文献:

黄鑫 姜景山 孙天洋 蒋威. 圆台形钢管混凝土短柱轴压性能研究[J]. 建筑结构,2022,48(04):100-105.

HUANG Xin JIANG Jingshan SUN Tianyang JIANG Wei. Axial compression behavior of round-shaped concrete-filled steel tube short columns[J]. Building Structure,2022,48(04):100-105.

作者:黄鑫 姜景山 孙天洋 蒋威
单位:南京工程学院建筑工程学院
摘要:开展了3根圆台形钢管混凝土短柱和1根圆柱形钢管混凝土短柱轴压试验,保持核心混凝土中部截面直径不变,以钢管混凝土短柱核心混凝土上表面与下表面直径比α为试验主要研究参数,对短柱的破坏特征和轴压力学性能进行了分析。试验结果表明:圆台形钢管混凝土短柱最终破坏形态为上端部钢管鼓屈,钢管与核心混凝土发生分离,试验过程中核心混凝土产生裂缝最终被压碎,α越大,核心混凝土加载后形态保留越完整;圆台形钢管混凝土短柱和圆柱形钢管混凝土短柱的轴向荷载-应变曲线基本相同,圆台形钢管混凝土柱具有较大的延性;短柱的极限承载力随着α的增大而增大。基于钢管屈服准则利用极限平衡静力法推导了考虑α和钢管内壁与地面夹角θ的圆台形钢管混凝土短柱轴压极限承载力计算公式,并验证了公式的合理性。
关键词:圆台形钢管混凝土,轴压试验,力学性能,极限承载力,破坏形态
作者简介:黄鑫,学士,主要从事钢混结构力学性能研究,Email:2540588261@qq.com。姜景山,博士,副教授,主要从事土木工程材料力学性质研究,Email:j.s.jiang@163.com。
基金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(51778282,51678292);江苏省大学生实践创新训练计划项目(201911276016Z,201911276094H);2021年江苏省产学研合作项目(BY2021044)。
尊敬的用户,本篇文章需要2元,点击支付交费后阅读
参考文献[1] 蔡绍怀.现代钢管混凝土结构[M].2版.北京:人民交通出版社,2007.
[2] 陈志华,杜颜胜,吴辽,等.矩形钢管混凝土结构研究综述[J].建筑结构,2015,45(16):40-46,76.
[3] 任庆新,李林,王庆利.方锥形钢管混凝土长柱工作机理分析[J].工业建筑,2014,44(4):27-31.
[4] 杜国锋,余思平,宋鑫,等.钢骨-T形钢管混凝土短柱轴心受压试验研究[J].建筑结构,2012,42(2):144-147.
[5] REN QINGXIN,HOU CHAO,LAM DENNIS,et al.Experiments on the bearing capacity of tapered concrete filled double skin steel tubular (CFDST)stub columns[J] Steel and Composite Structures,2014,17(5):667-686.
[6] 史艳莉,张宸,王景玄,等.圆锥形中空夹层钢管混凝土压弯构件抗震性能[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2019,36(5):80-88.
[7] 李华,王万祯,朱放,等.变截面方钢管轻骨料混凝土柱-H钢梁隔板贯通节点抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2018,39(S1):118-126.
[8] 金属材料拉伸试验第1部分:室温试验方法:GB/T 228.1—2010[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2011.
[9] 普通混凝土力学性能试验方法标准:GB/T 50081—2002[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2003.
[10] 肖建庄,杨洁,黄一杰,等.钢管约束再生混凝土轴压试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2011,32(6):92-98.
[11] 刘洁,王正中.方钢管混凝土短柱轴压极限承载力计算方法分析[J].建筑结构,2015,45(10):21-25,42.
[12] 李小伟,赵均海,朱铁栋,等.方钢管混凝土轴压短柱的力学性能[J].中国公路学报,2006,19(4):77-81.
[13] 柯晓军,陈宗平,应武挡,等.钢管高强混凝土柱轴压性能试验研究[J].建筑结构,2014,44(16):46-49,76.
[14] 廖慧娟,周云,陈太平.圆钢管混凝土(CCFST)短柱轴心受压承载力的统计分析[J].中国科技论文,2018,13(13):1545-1551.
[15] 康洪震,钱稼茹.钢管高强混凝土组合柱轴压承载力试验研究[J].建筑结构,2011,41(6):64-67.
[16] 刘业,张大长,李布辉.Q345钢管自密实混凝土短柱轴压力学性能试验[J].建筑结构,2017,47(23):66-71.
[17] 肖海兵,赵均海,孙楚平,等.薄壁钢管轻骨料混凝土轴压短柱承载力分析[J].建筑结构,2012,42(11):101-106.
[18] 任鹏举.变截面钢管混凝土短柱轴压力学性能研究[D].西安:长安大学,2019.
[19] 任庆新,刘绍鹏,贾连光.圆锥形钢管混凝土长柱力学性能研究[J].工业建筑,2014,44(4):32-36.
Axial compression behavior of round-shaped concrete-filled steel tube short columns
HUANG Xin JIANG Jingshan SUN Tianyang JIANG Wei
(School of Architectural Engineering, Nanjing Institute of Technology)
Abstract: Axial compression tests were performed on 3 round-shaped concrete-filled steel tube short columns and 1 cylindrical concrete-filled steel tube short column, keeping the diameter of central section of core concrete unchanged, and using the diameter ratio α of upper and lower surface of core concrete of concrete-filled steel tube short column as the main research parameter. The failure characteristics and axial compressive mechanical properties of short columns were analyzed. The test results show that the final failure shape of the round-shaped concrete-filled steel tube short column is the upper end steel tube bulge, and the steel tube is separated from the core concrete. The core concrete crack during the tests and is eventually crushed, and the larger the α, the more complete the shape retention of the core concrete after testing. The axial load-strain curves of the round-shaped concrete-filled steel tube short column and the cylindrical concrete-filled steel tube short column are basically the same, and the round-shaped concrete-filled steel tube short column has a large ductility; the ultimate bearing capacity of the short column increases with the increase of α. The ultimate equilibrium static force method based on the steel tube yield criterion was used to derive the formula for calculating the axial ultimate bearing capacity of a round-shaped concrete-filled steel tube short column considering the α and the angle θ between the inner wall of the steel tube and the ground, and the rationality of the formula was verified.
Keywords: round-shaped concrete-filled steel tube; axial compression test; mechanical performance; ultimate bearing capacity; failure model
929 0 0
文字:     A-     A+     默认 取消