附加阳光间在西宁机场航站楼的应用研究
摘要：附加阳光间作为被动式阳光房的一种形式已在民用建筑中大量应用，而登机桥可以看作航站楼的附加阳光间。基于此理念对西宁机场航站楼登机桥提出2种实施方案，并采用实测数据验证DeST-s所建模型的准确性。结果表明：方案1可减少航站楼供热量68.5 GJ/a,减少碳排放4.2 t/a;方案2可减少航站楼供热量157.6 GJ/a,减少碳排放9.6 t/a。现有登机桥和新建登机桥若按2种方案实施后可减少航站楼供热量5 687 GJ/a,减少碳排放345.2 t/a。
关键词：航站楼登机桥附加阳光间传热量DeST-s模拟
尊敬的用户，本篇文章需要2元，点击支付交费后阅读
限时优惠福利：领取VIP会员
全年期刊、VIP视频免费!
全年期刊、VIP视频免费!
参考文献[1] 许安琪，杨春方，周敏，等.弹性供暖下2种太阳能供暖系统保证率对比研究[J].暖通空调，2021,51(9):104- 107.
[2] 刘加平，何泉，杨柳，等.黄土高原新型窑居建筑[J].建筑与文化，2007(6):3.
[3] 邹广宇.东北村镇住宅附加阳光间式被动太阳房优化策略研究[D].哈尔滨：哈尔滨工业大学，2016:2.
[4] 张国艳，丁昀，杨庆，等.基于EnergyPlus的附加阳光间式太阳房节能分析[J].土木建筑与环境工程，2015,37(增刊1):32- 35.
[5] 王登甲，刘艳峰，刘加平.青藏高原被动太阳能建筑供暖性能实验研究[J].四川建筑科学研究，2015,41 (2):269- 274.
[6] YANG F G,CHEN C,LI Y R,et al.Thermal performance investigation on the boarding bridge of Beijing's capital airport[J].Procedia engineering,2017,205:1967- 1974.
[7] 江泳，朱颖心.地铁车站公共区冬季温度设计标准探讨[J].暖通空调，2002,32(4):20- 22.
[8] 郑立红，许安琪，黄珂.基于本地化全寿命周期评价的北方地区适宜性供热方式研究[J].暖通空调，2020,50(11):28- 35.
[2] 刘加平，何泉，杨柳，等.黄土高原新型窑居建筑[J].建筑与文化，2007(6):3.
[3] 邹广宇.东北村镇住宅附加阳光间式被动太阳房优化策略研究[D].哈尔滨：哈尔滨工业大学，2016:2.
[4] 张国艳，丁昀，杨庆，等.基于EnergyPlus的附加阳光间式太阳房节能分析[J].土木建筑与环境工程，2015,37(增刊1):32- 35.
[5] 王登甲，刘艳峰，刘加平.青藏高原被动太阳能建筑供暖性能实验研究[J].四川建筑科学研究，2015,41 (2):269- 274.
[6] YANG F G,CHEN C,LI Y R,et al.Thermal performance investigation on the boarding bridge of Beijing's capital airport[J].Procedia engineering,2017,205:1967- 1974.
[7] 江泳，朱颖心.地铁车站公共区冬季温度设计标准探讨[J].暖通空调，2002,32(4):20- 22.
[8] 郑立红，许安琪，黄珂.基于本地化全寿命周期评价的北方地区适宜性供热方式研究[J].暖通空调，2020,50(11):28- 35.
Application of additional sunshine room to Xining Airport terminal
Abstract: As a form of passive sunshine room, additional sunshine room has been widely used in civil buildings. The boarding bridge can be regarded as the additional sunshine room of the terminal. Based on this idea, two implementation schemes are proposed for the boarding bridge of Xining Airport terminal. The measured data are used to verify the accuracy of the model built by DeST-s. The results show that the first scheme can reduce the heat supply of the terminal by 68.5 GJ/a, and the carbon emission by 4.2 t/a. The second scheme can reduce the heat supply of the terminal by 157.6 GJ/a, and the carbon emission by 9.6 t/a. The existing boarding bridge and the new boarding bridge can reduce the heat supply by 5 687 GJ/a and the carbon emission by 345.2 t/a.
Keywords: terminal; boarding bridge; additional sunshine room; heat transfer; DeST-s simulation;
890
0
0