足尺毛竹梁长期蠕变性能研究
引用文献：
钟紫勤 赵仕兴 陈可 周巧玲. 足尺毛竹梁长期蠕变性能研究[J]. 建筑结构，2023，48（07）：118-124.
ZHONG Ziqin ZHAO Shixing CHEN Ke ZHOU Qiaoling. Study on long-term creep performance of full-culm Moso bamboo beam[J]. Building Structure，2023,48（07）：118-124.
摘要：为研究足尺毛竹梁的长期蠕变性能，分析了已有的试验数据，进一步探究毛竹梁在长期荷载作用下的蠕变规律。从微观层次分析了竹材蠕变性能随环境湿度、温度变化而改变的机理；以强度储备、蠕变速率以及相对挠度作为控制指标，评估了毛竹梁的蠕变性能；对毛竹梁蠕变模型开展了适用性研究，并基于蠕变模型的挠度预测给出了毛竹梁的建议应力比。结果表明：环境中湿度和温度的变化会引起竹材的物理性质发生变化，从而改变竹材的蠕变性能；应力比较小的毛竹梁蠕变性能总体上符合工程使用要求；将Burger模型中表征黏性变形的线性函数改进为幂函数，改进的Burger模型结合了Burger模型和幂律模型的特点，能更好地模拟毛竹梁的蠕变性能。最后，基于蠕变模型的长期变形预测值，建议了毛竹梁应力比不应大于0.50,以防止原竹建筑在50年的设计基准期内产生过大的蠕变变形。
关键词：毛竹梁；长期蠕变；应力比；性能评估；改进的Burger模型；挠度预测；
基金：四川省科技计划资助(2023YFS0393)；四川省住房城乡建设领域科技创新课题(SCJSKJ2022-33)；四川省建筑设计研究院有限公司科研项目(KYYN202221)。
尊敬的用户，本篇文章需要2元，点击支付交费后阅读
限时优惠福利：领取VIP会员
全年期刊、会议视频
全部免费！培训视频打折！
全年期刊、会议视频
全部免费！培训视频打折！
参考文献[1] LI P H,ZHOU G M,DU H Q,et al.Current and potential carbon stocks in Moso bamboo forests in China[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2015,156:89-96.
[2] SEBASTIAN K,ANDREW L,DAVID T,et al.Structural use of bamboo:part 2:durability and preservation[J].Structure Engineer,2016,94(10):38-43.
[3] 李玉顺，张秀华，吴培增，等.重组竹在长期荷载作用下的蠕变行为[J].建筑材料学报，2019,22(1):65-71.
[4] 涂道伍，邵卓平.基于Burger体的竹材横纹热压流变模型[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2008,32(2):67-70.
[5] 张晓敏，孙正军，王喜明.竹材径向压缩蠕变行为研究[J].林业机械与木工设备，2010,38(6):26-29.
[6] 闫薇，崔海星，朱一辛.竹材的拉伸短期蠕变行为及模拟[J].林业科技开发，2013,27(3):46-49.
[7] GOTTRON J,HARRIES K,XU Q F.Creep behaviour of bamboo[J].Construction and Building Materials,2014,66(15):79-88.
[8] JANSSEN J.Bamboo in building structures[D].Eindhoven:Eindhoven University of Technology,1981.
[9] ZHONG Z Q,ZHOU X H,HE Z Q,et al.Creep behavior of full-culm Moso bamboo under long-term bending[J].Journal of Building Engineering,2022,46:103710.
[10] 汪俊达.圆竹杆的自然劣化和长期受弯蠕变性能的研究[D].重庆：重庆大学，2020.
[11] 建筑用竹材物理力学性能试验方法：JG/T 199—2007[S].北京：中国标准出版社，2007.
[12] WANG X H,SONG B.Application of bionic design inspired by bamboo structures in collapse resistance of thin-walled cylindrical shell steel tower[J].Thin-Walled Structures,2022,171:108666.
[13] 圆竹结构建筑技术规程：CECS 434—2016[S].北京：中国计划出版社，2016.
[14] 赵新斌，李斌.异常值检测方法在民航告警中的应用[J].南京航空航天大学学报，2017,49(4):524-530.
[15] ZHAO K P,WEI Y,CHEN S,et al.Experimental investigation of the long-term behavior of reconstituted bamboo beams with various loading levels[J].Journal of Building Engineering,2021,36:102107.
[16] YOUSSEFIAN S,JAKES J E,RAHBAR N.Variation of nanostructures,molecular interactions,and anisotropic elastic moduli of lignocellulosic cell walls with moisture[J].Science Reports,2017,7(1):1-10.
[17] 袁晶，方长华，张淑琴，等.竹材细胞壁水分研究进展[J].竹子学报，2020,39(1):24-32.
[18] 彭辉，蒋佳荔，詹天翼，等.木材普通蠕变和机械吸湿蠕变研究概述[J].林业科学，2016,52(4):116-126.
[19] Standard specification for evaluation of duration of load and creep effects of wood and wood-based products:ASTM D6815-09[S].West Conshohocken:ASTM International,2015.
[20] 王卓琳，刘伟庆，许清风，等.内嵌CFRP筋加固木梁持荷6年受力性能的试验研究[J].建筑结构，2020,50(5):15-19,14.
[2] SEBASTIAN K,ANDREW L,DAVID T,et al.Structural use of bamboo:part 2:durability and preservation[J].Structure Engineer,2016,94(10):38-43.
[3] 李玉顺，张秀华，吴培增，等.重组竹在长期荷载作用下的蠕变行为[J].建筑材料学报，2019,22(1):65-71.
[4] 涂道伍，邵卓平.基于Burger体的竹材横纹热压流变模型[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2008,32(2):67-70.
[5] 张晓敏，孙正军，王喜明.竹材径向压缩蠕变行为研究[J].林业机械与木工设备，2010,38(6):26-29.
[6] 闫薇，崔海星，朱一辛.竹材的拉伸短期蠕变行为及模拟[J].林业科技开发，2013,27(3):46-49.
[7] GOTTRON J,HARRIES K,XU Q F.Creep behaviour of bamboo[J].Construction and Building Materials,2014,66(15):79-88.
[8] JANSSEN J.Bamboo in building structures[D].Eindhoven:Eindhoven University of Technology,1981.
[9] ZHONG Z Q,ZHOU X H,HE Z Q,et al.Creep behavior of full-culm Moso bamboo under long-term bending[J].Journal of Building Engineering,2022,46:103710.
[10] 汪俊达.圆竹杆的自然劣化和长期受弯蠕变性能的研究[D].重庆：重庆大学，2020.
[11] 建筑用竹材物理力学性能试验方法：JG/T 199—2007[S].北京：中国标准出版社，2007.
[12] WANG X H,SONG B.Application of bionic design inspired by bamboo structures in collapse resistance of thin-walled cylindrical shell steel tower[J].Thin-Walled Structures,2022,171:108666.
[13] 圆竹结构建筑技术规程：CECS 434—2016[S].北京：中国计划出版社，2016.
[14] 赵新斌，李斌.异常值检测方法在民航告警中的应用[J].南京航空航天大学学报，2017,49(4):524-530.
[15] ZHAO K P,WEI Y,CHEN S,et al.Experimental investigation of the long-term behavior of reconstituted bamboo beams with various loading levels[J].Journal of Building Engineering,2021,36:102107.
[16] YOUSSEFIAN S,JAKES J E,RAHBAR N.Variation of nanostructures,molecular interactions,and anisotropic elastic moduli of lignocellulosic cell walls with moisture[J].Science Reports,2017,7(1):1-10.
[17] 袁晶，方长华，张淑琴，等.竹材细胞壁水分研究进展[J].竹子学报，2020,39(1):24-32.
[18] 彭辉，蒋佳荔，詹天翼，等.木材普通蠕变和机械吸湿蠕变研究概述[J].林业科学，2016,52(4):116-126.
[19] Standard specification for evaluation of duration of load and creep effects of wood and wood-based products:ASTM D6815-09[S].West Conshohocken:ASTM International,2015.
[20] 王卓琳，刘伟庆，许清风，等.内嵌CFRP筋加固木梁持荷6年受力性能的试验研究[J].建筑结构，2020,50(5):15-19,14.
Study on long-term creep performance of full-culm Moso bamboo beam
Abstract: In order to study the long-term creep performance of full-culm Moso bamboo beams, the existing test data were analyzed, and the creep law of full-culm Moso bamboo beam under long-term load was further explored. The mechanism that the creep performance of bamboo changes with the environmental humidity and temperature was analyzed from the microscopic level. The creep performance of Moso bamboo beam was evaluated by adequate strength, creep rate and fractional deflection. The applicability of creep models of Moso bamboo beam was studied, and the recommended stress ratio of Moso bamboo beam was given based on the deflection prediction of creep models. The results show that the changes of humidity and temperature in the environment would cause changes in the physical properties of bamboo, thus changing the creep performance of bamboo. The creep performance of Moso bamboo beam with small stress ratio generally meet the engineering requirements. The viscosity deformation in Burger model is modified as a linear function of time to a power function, and the modified Burger model combines the characteristics of Burger model and power function model, which can better simulate the creep performance of Moso bamboo beam. Finally, based on the long-term deformation prediction of the creep model, it is suggested that the stress ratio of Moso bamboo beam should not be greater than 0.50 to prevent excessive creep deformation of the original bamboo building in the 50 year design reference period.
Keywords: Moso bamboo beam; long-term creep; stress ratio; performance evaluation; modified Burger model; deflection prediction
536
0
0