低层双面叠合夹心保温剪力墙结构动力弹塑性分析研究

引用文献:

吴学淑 李进军 王平山 纵斌. 低层双面叠合夹心保温剪力墙结构动力弹塑性分析研究[J]. 建筑结构,2022,48(23):19-25.

WU Xueshu LI Jinjun WANG Pingshan ZONG Bin. Study on dynamic elasto-plastic analysis of low-rise double-faced superimposed sandwich insulation shear wall structure[J]. Building Structure,2022,48(23):19-25.

作者:吴学淑 李进军 王平山 纵斌
单位:华东建筑设计研究院有限公司 上海装配式建筑技术集成工程技术研究中心
摘要:基于足尺模型振动台试验,对低层双面叠合夹心保温剪力墙结构进行动力弹塑性分析,并对数值计算结果和振动台试验结果进行对比,结果表明,有限元计算的结构响应及构件损伤情况基本和振动台试验结果相吻合,7度罕遇地震时该结构基本处于弹性状态,8度罕遇地震时构件损伤发展,9度罕遇地震时结构进入弹塑性状态,但变形满足大震不倒的要求。对有外叶墙模型和无外叶墙模型的动力弹塑性计算结果进行对比,随着输入地震波峰值加速度增大,两者结构响应发展趋势基本一致,无外叶墙模型的结构位移响应略大于有外叶墙模型,两者构件损伤位置和损伤发展趋势基本一致,无外叶墙模型墙体损伤程度略大。分析结果表明,在结构弹塑性状态下,外叶墙和桁架筋对结构抗震能力具有一定贡献,降低结构在地震作用下的损伤。
关键词:双面叠合夹心保温剪力墙结构;有外叶墙模型;无外叶墙模型;罕遇地震;动力弹塑性分析;
作者简介:吴学淑,博士,高级工程师,一级注册结构工程师,主要从事装配式结构研究,Email:xueshu_wu@163.com。
基金:国家重点研发计划资助(2018YFD1100903)。
尊敬的用户,本篇文章需要2元,点击支付交费后阅读
参考文献[1] O′HEGARTY R,KINNANE O.Review of precast concrete sandwich panels and their innovations[J].Construction and Building Materials,2020,233:117145.
[2] 吴学淑,李进军,王平山,等.预制混凝土夹心保温墙应用研究进展[J].建筑结构,2021,51(S2):1197-1202.
[3] 王滋军,刘伟庆,翟文豪,等.新型预制叠合剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2015,46(4):1409-1419.
[4] 王平山,崔家春,徐自然,等.双面叠合剪力墙结构力学性能研究[J].建筑结构,2020,50(18):1-8.
[5] 薛伟辰,俞鹏程,刘硕,等.双面叠合剪力墙竖向钢筋连接构造优化研究[J].施工技术,2018,47(12):25-29.
[6] 薛伟辰,李亚,蔡磊,等.双面叠合混凝土剪力墙平面内和平面外抗震性能研究[J].工程力学,2018,35(5):47-53,142.
[7] 王滋军,刘伟庆,叶燕华,等.钢筋混凝土开洞叠合剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2012,33(7):156-163.
[8] 王滋军,刘伟庆,卢吉松,等.钢筋混凝土无洞叠合剪力墙低周反复荷载试验[J].南京工业大学学报(自然科学版),2011,33(6):5-11.
[9] 王平山,纵斌,李进军,等.低层双面叠合夹心保温剪力墙结构设计与应用研究[J].建筑结构,2022,52(23):1-6,86.
[10] 王平山,纵斌,恽燕春,等,双面叠合夹心保温剪力墙结构足尺振动台试验研究[J].建筑结构,2022,52(23):7-13,125 .
[11] 吴学淑,王平山,纵斌,李进军.低层双面叠合夹心保温剪力墙结构抗震设计数值模拟方法研究[J].建筑结构,2022,52(23):14-18,119.
[12] Abaqus 2016 ananlysis user′s guide[M].Dassault Systèmes,2015.
[13] 同济大学.双面叠合夹心保温剪力墙结构项目模拟地震振动台试验研究报告[R].2021.
Study on dynamic elasto-plastic analysis of low-rise double-faced superimposed sandwich insulation shear wall structure
WU Xueshu LI Jinjun WANG Pingshan ZONG Bin
(East China Architectural Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd. Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Assembly Building Technology Integration)
Abstract: Based on the full-scale shaking table test, the dynamic elasto-plastic analysis of the low-rise double-faced superimposed sandwich insulation shear wall structure was carried out, and the numerical calculation results with the shaking table test results were compared. The results show that the structural response and damage calculated by finite element analysis are almost consistent with the results of the shaking table test. The structure is basically in an elastic state during the 7 degree rare earthquake, the component damage develops during the 8 degree rare earthquake, and the structure enters an elastic-plastic state during the 9 degree rare earthquake, but it's deformations meet the requirements of no collapse under rare earthquake. The dynamic elastic-plastic calculation results of the model with and without outer prefabricated wall were compared. With the increase of the peak acceleration of the input seismic wave, the development trend of the structural response of the two models is basically consistent. The displacement response of the model without outer prefabricated wall is slightly greater than that of the model with outer prefabricated wall. The damage location and damage development trend of the two models are basically consistent, and the damage degree of the model without outer prefabricated wall is slightly greater. The analysis results show that under the elastic-plastic state of the structure, the outer prefabricated wall and truss reinforcement connectors have contribution to the seismic capacity of the structure and reduces the damage of the structure under seismic load.
Keywords: low-rise double-faced superimposed sandwich insulation shear wall structure; model with prefabricated wall; model without prefabricated wall; rare earthquake dynamic elasto-plastic analysis
360 0 0
文字:     A-     A+     默认 取消