钢管插入式基础锚固机理与承载性能研究
引用文献：
余亮 朱轶 陶青松 张立 程尧 王金昌. 钢管插入式基础锚固机理与承载性能研究[J]. 建筑结构，2023，48（12）：126-131，143.
YU Liang ZHU Yi TAO Qingsong ZHANG Li CHENG Yao WANG Jinchang. Study on anchoring mechanism and load-bearing performances of steel-tube-inserted foundation[J]. Building Structure，2023,48（12）：126-131，143.
摘要：为研究新型钢管插入式基础的锚固机理与承载性能，通过钢管与混凝土的粘结锚固性能试验，基于粘聚带界面接触本构和混凝土损伤塑性模型，采用非线性有限元方法，探讨了锚板的数量、位置和间距对基础损伤破坏模式和承载性能的影响。首先通过有限元结果与试验结果对比，验证了模型和方法的有效性与准确性；然后利用实际工程的等比例模型，对钢管插入式基础的荷载-位移曲线、损伤因子分布及锚板的应力分布系统地分析。结果表明：基础抗拔承载力与锚板的数量及位置有关，双锚板承载能力大于单锚板；单锚板最佳位置为距离钢管顶部1m处，双锚板抗拔承载力随锚板间距增加先增大后减小，双锚板间的最佳间距为0.8m;从损伤的发展和裂缝控制的角度，可以设置“小而多”的锚板。
关键词：钢管插入式基础；粘结锚固性能试验；损伤破坏模式；粘聚带界面接触本构模型；混凝土损伤塑性模型；
基金：国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(2015CB057801)；辽宁省自然科学基金(2018011666-301)。
尊敬的用户，本篇文章需要2元，点击支付交费后阅读
限时优惠福利：领取VIP会员
全年期刊、会议视频
全部免费！培训视频打折！
全年期刊、会议视频
全部免费！培训视频打折！
参考文献[1] 熊卫红，刘先珊，李正良，等.500 kV输电线路基础沉降铁塔的可靠度分析[J].电力建设，2015,36(2):41-47.
[2] 程永锋，李正.输电线路插入式基础和直柱式基础的性状比较[J].电力建设，2003,24(7):25-28.
[3] 鲁先龙，程永锋.750kV输电线路角钢插入式基础承载力试验[J].中国电力，2006,39(1):18-21.
[4] 童瑞铭，屈武，程永锋，等.输电线路杆塔钢管插入式基础柱体结构承载性能试验研究[J].建筑结构，2017,47(S2):223-226.
[5] 王金昌，陈页开.ABAQUS在土木工程中的应用[M].杭州：浙江大学出版社，2006.
[6] 苏宁粉，吕西林，周颖，等.某立面收进复杂高层建筑结构抗震性能评估[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2012(10):1893-1899,1931.
[7] LEE J,FENVES G L.A plastic-damage concrete model for earthquake analysis of dams[J].Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics,1998,27(9):937-956.
[8] LEE J,FENVES G L.Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics,1998,124(8):892-900.
[9] 陈曦，周德源.矩形钢管混凝土轴压短柱中采用不同混凝土材料模型的性能比较分析[J].建筑结构学报，2009,30(3):120-125.
[10] 混凝土结构设计规范：GB 50010—2010[S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2011.
[11] NIELSEN M P,HOANG L C.Limit analysis and concrete plasticity[M].London:Taylor & Francis,2010.
[12] 明铭，郑山锁，郑淏，等.型钢高性能纤维混凝土粘结滑移性能试验研究[J].工程力学，2020,37(8):148-157.
[2] 程永锋，李正.输电线路插入式基础和直柱式基础的性状比较[J].电力建设，2003,24(7):25-28.
[3] 鲁先龙，程永锋.750kV输电线路角钢插入式基础承载力试验[J].中国电力，2006,39(1):18-21.
[4] 童瑞铭，屈武，程永锋，等.输电线路杆塔钢管插入式基础柱体结构承载性能试验研究[J].建筑结构，2017,47(S2):223-226.
[5] 王金昌，陈页开.ABAQUS在土木工程中的应用[M].杭州：浙江大学出版社，2006.
[6] 苏宁粉，吕西林，周颖，等.某立面收进复杂高层建筑结构抗震性能评估[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2012(10):1893-1899,1931.
[7] LEE J,FENVES G L.A plastic-damage concrete model for earthquake analysis of dams[J].Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics,1998,27(9):937-956.
[8] LEE J,FENVES G L.Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics,1998,124(8):892-900.
[9] 陈曦，周德源.矩形钢管混凝土轴压短柱中采用不同混凝土材料模型的性能比较分析[J].建筑结构学报，2009,30(3):120-125.
[10] 混凝土结构设计规范：GB 50010—2010[S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2011.
[11] NIELSEN M P,HOANG L C.Limit analysis and concrete plasticity[M].London:Taylor & Francis,2010.
[12] 明铭，郑山锁，郑淏，等.型钢高性能纤维混凝土粘结滑移性能试验研究[J].工程力学，2020,37(8):148-157.
Study on anchoring mechanism and load-bearing performances of steel-tube-inserted foundation
Abstract: To study the anchoring mechanism and load-bearing performance of the new type steel-tube-inserted foundation, through the bond and anchorage performance test of steel tube and concrete, based on the cohesive zone interface contact constitutive model and concrete damage plasticity model, the effects of the number of the anchor plates, the initial position and the spacing of the anchor plates on the damage mode and bearing capacity of foundation were discussed by using the nonlinear finite element method. Firstly, the validity and accuracy of the model and method were verified by comparing the finite element results with the experimental results. Then, the load-displacement curve, the damage factor distribution and the stress distribution of anchor plates were systematically analyzed by using the same scale model of an actual project. The results show that the uplift bearing capacity of the foundation is related to the number and position of anchor plates, and the bearing capacity of double anchor plates is greater than that of single anchor plate. The best position of single anchor plate is 1m from the top of steel tube. The distance between plates increases first and then decreases, and the optimal distance between double anchor plates is 0.8m.From the perspective of damage development and crack control, "small but many" anchor plates can be installed.
Keywords: steel-tube-inserted foundation; bond and anchorage performance test; damage and failure mode; cohesive zone interface contact constitutive model; concrete damaged plasticity model
504
0
0