再生砌体填充墙-型钢再生混凝土框架结构抗震性能研究

引用文献:

张妍青, 杨鹏辉, 周志明. 再生砌体填充墙-型钢再生混凝土框架结构抗震性能研究[J]. 建筑结构,2022,48(13):62-68.

ZHANG Yanqing ,YANG Penghui ,ZHOU Zhiming. Seismic performance analysis of recycled masonry infill wall-shaped steel recycled concrete frame structure[J]. Building Structure,2022,48(13):62-68.

作者:张妍青, 杨鹏辉, 周志明
单位:新乡学院土木工程与建筑学院, 西安建筑科技大学设计研究总院 ,西安建筑科技大学土木工程学院
摘要:为研究再生砌体填充墙-型钢再生混凝土框架结构的抗震性能,试验设计了1榀再生混凝土框架和2榀再生砌体填充墙-型钢再生混凝土框架并进行低周往复加载试验。试验结果表明:纯框架试件及带填充墙框架试件均为延性破坏,填充墙沿框架平面对角线区域破坏较为严重,梁端与柱端先后出现塑性铰,符合“强柱弱梁”的抗震设计概念;带填充墙框架相比纯框架峰值承载力提升80%左右,平均位移延性系数大于6,表明其具有良好的变形能力;带填充墙框架在加载前期耗能能力强于纯框架试件,后期因填充墙破坏而承载能力迅速下降,极限位移较小,耗能能力弱于纯框架试件;轴压比越大,带填充墙框架峰值荷载后的延性和耗能能力下降越快。基于现有等效斜压杆理论对试件进行Pushover分析,结果表明Klingner模型与试验结果吻合最好。合理布置的填充墙可作为结构抗震的第一道防线,性能点处结构满足“大震不倒”的抗震要求。
关键词:型钢混凝土框架;再生砌体填充墙;再生混凝土;等效斜压杆理论;抗震性能
作者简介:张妍青,硕士,讲师,主要从事结构工程抗震研究,Email:272723775@qq.com。杨鹏辉,博士,高级工程师,主要从事新型材料与新型结构体系研究,Email:yph_003@163.com。
基金:国家自然科学基金项目(51308444);陕西省自然科学基础研究基金资助项目(2018JM5124)。
尊敬的用户,本篇文章需要2元,点击支付交费后阅读
参考文献[1] 肖建庄.再生混凝土创新研究与进展[M].北京:科学出版社,2020.
[2] 史铁花,程绍革,王瑾,等.设置填充墙的框架结构试验研究与模拟分析[J].建筑结构,2017,47(24):42-48,54.
[3] 孙跃东,肖建庄,周德源,等.再生轻质砌块填充墙再生混凝土框架抗震性能的试验研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2005(5):126-133.
[4] 薛建阳,王刚,刘辉 ,等.型钢再生混凝土框架抗震性能试验研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版),2014,46(5):629-634.
[5] 薛建阳,高亮,罗峥,等.再生混凝土空心砌块填充墙-型钢再生混凝土框架结构抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2014,35(3):77-84.
[6] 翟长海,王晓敏,孔璟常,等.砌体填充墙RC框架结构抗震性能研究现状及展望[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2018,50(6):1-13.
[7] 陈道政,陆宝金.框架填充墙对结构抗震性能的影响[J].建筑结构,2017,47(24):49-54.
[8] 李艳艳,苗少峥,张亚龙.HRB600E钢筋混凝土柱抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构,2020,50(15):58-62,68.
[9] HOLMES M.Steel frames with brickwork and concrete infilling[J].Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers,1961,19(4):473-478.
[10] STAFFORD SMITH B,CARTER C.A method of analysis for infilled frames[J].Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers,1969,44(1):31-48.
[11] KLINGNER R E,BERTERO V V.Infilled frames in earth quake resistant construction[R].Berkley:University of California,1976.
[12] Nehrp guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings:FEMA273[S].Washington D C:FEMA in Furtherance of the Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction,1997.
[13] SCOTT B D,PARK R,PRIESTLEY M J N.Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates[J].Journal of the American Concrete Institute,1982,79(1):13-27.
[14] MENEGOTTO M,PINTO P E.Method of analysis for cyclically loaded reinforced concrete plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under normal force and bending[C]// Symposium on Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well Defined Repeated Loads.Switzerland:IABSE ,1973:15-22.
[15] 建筑抗震设计规范:GB 50011—2010[S].2016年版.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2016.
Seismic performance analysis of recycled masonry infill wall-shaped steel recycled concrete frame structure
ZHANG Yanqing ,YANG Penghui ,ZHOU Zhiming
(College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Xinxiang University General Institute of Design and Research, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology School of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology)
Abstract: In order to study the seismic performance of recycled masonry infill wall-shaped steel recycled concrete frame structure, one specimen of recycled concrete frame and two specimens of recycled masonry infill wall-shaped steel recycled concrete frame structure were designed and subjected to low cycle reciprocating loading test. The test results show that both the pure frame specimens and the frame specimens with filled walls have ductile failure, and the failure of the filled wall is more serious along the diagonal area of the frame plane, and the plastic hinge appears successively at the beam and column ends, which accords with the seismic design concept of “strong column and weak beam”. The peak bearing capacity of the frame with filled wall is about 80% higher than that of the pure frame, and the average displacement ductility coefficient is greater than 6, indicating that it has good deformation capacity. In the early stage of loading, the energy dissipation capacity of the frame with filled wall is stronger than that of the pure frame specimen, but in the later stage, the bearing capacity decreases rapidly due to the failure of the filled wall, and the ultimate displacement is smaller, and the energy dissipation capacity is weaker than that of the pure frame specimen. The larger the axial compression ratio is, the faster the ductility and energy dissipation capacity of the frame with filled wall decreases after peak load. Pushover analysis of specimens based on the existing equivalent baroclinic bar theory shows that Klingner model is in good agreement with the test results. Reasonably arranged infill walls can serve as the first line of defense against earthquakes, and the structure at the performance point can meet the seismic requirements of “no collapsing under the rarely-occurred earthquake”.
Keywords: shaped steel concrete frame; recycled masonry filled wall; recycled concrete; equivalent baroclinic bar theory; seismic performance
389 0 0
文字:     A-     A+     默认 取消