箍筋环扣连接预制混凝土叠合梁受剪性能试验研究
引用文献：
张玲聪 卢旦 崔暘 赵张源 施佳君 杨博. 箍筋环扣连接预制混凝土叠合梁受剪性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构，2022，48（04）：106-111.
ZHANG Lingcong LU Dan CUI Yang ZHAO Zhangyuan SHI Jiajun YANG Bo. Experimental study on shear performance of precast concrete composite beams connected by stirrup ring buckle[J]. Building Structure，2022,48（04）：106-111.
摘要：为了方便现场施工，提出了一种箍筋环扣连接预制混凝土新型叠合梁。设计制作了不同剪跨比的4个预制混凝土叠合梁试件(包括“凹”形和“凸”形叠合梁各2个)和2个现浇对比梁试件，进行单调集中加载试验。通过对试件的破坏形式、荷载-挠度曲线、钢筋应变等进行分析，系统地研究了箍筋制作工艺以及箍筋连接长度等因素对叠合梁受剪性能的影响。试验结果表明：各试件均发生剪切破坏，环扣连接箍筋能有效传递梁内剪力；“凸”形叠合梁的纵筋应变分布与现浇梁基本一致，“凹”形叠合梁与现浇梁的纵筋应变差异较大；新型叠合梁的破坏荷载和初始刚度分别比现浇梁平均提高约7%和4%;“凹”形叠合梁在构件受力性能、制作工艺和现场施工便利性等方面均优于“凸”形叠合梁。
关键词：预制混凝土叠合梁，箍筋环扣连接，单调加载试验，受剪性能
基金：浙江省重点研发计划项目(2018C03033-2)；广西自然科学基金项目(2018GXNSFAA050145)；国家级大学生创新创业训练计划项目(201810338030)。
尊敬的用户，本篇文章需要2元，点击支付交费后阅读
限时优惠福利：领取VIP会员
全年期刊、会议视频
全部免费！培训视频打折！
全年期刊、会议视频
全部免费！培训视频打折！
参考文献[1] GOHNERT M.Horizontal shear transfer across a roughened surface[J].Cement and Concrete Composites,2003,25 (3):379-385.
[2] LAWRENCE F K,ADAM S.Interface shear in high strength composite T-beams[J].PCI Journal,2004,49 (4):102-110.
[3] SALIH M N A,TAHIR M MD,MOHAMMAD S,et al.Experimental study on flexural behaviour of partially encased cold-formed steel composite beams using rebar as shear connector[J].IOP Conference Series:Materials Science and Engineering,2019,513(1):012038.
[4] 黄赛超，周旺华.二次受力混凝土叠合连续梁斜截面受力性能的试验研究[J].土木工程学报，1994,27(2):65-74.
[5] 周开富，魏欣，葛文杰，等.梁板叠合构件斜截面受力性能试验研究[J].建筑结构，2017,47(24):76-82.
[6] 袁海梅.新型叠合梁的抗弯性能研究[D].长沙：湖南大学，2013.
[7] 张多新，梁宾桥，廖松然.混凝土叠合梁设计理论综述[J].华北水利水电学院学报，2010,31(3):24-27.
[8] 王磊，彭笑川.叠合梁受弯性能试验研究[J].建筑结构，2013,43(8):51-53.
[9] 洪炳钦，杨俊杰，杨遒，等.叠合梁斜截面抗剪性能的试验研究[J].浙江工业大学学报，2007,35(4):464-468.
[10] 吴方伯，刘彪，邓利斌，等.新型叠合梁端部抗剪性能试验[J].建筑科学与工程学报，2014,31(2):26-31.
[11] 张雷，代领杰，胡翔，等.组合封闭箍筋混凝土叠合梁受扭性能试验[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报，2017,38(11):1745-1750.
[12] 装配式混凝土结构技术规程：JGJ 1—2014[S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2014.
[13] Building code requirements for structural concrete(ACI 318-02)and commentary (ACI 318R-02)[S].Farmington Hills:American Concrete Institute,2001.
[14] 普通混凝土力学性能试验方法标准：GB/T 50081—2002[S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2007.
[2] LAWRENCE F K,ADAM S.Interface shear in high strength composite T-beams[J].PCI Journal,2004,49 (4):102-110.
[3] SALIH M N A,TAHIR M MD,MOHAMMAD S,et al.Experimental study on flexural behaviour of partially encased cold-formed steel composite beams using rebar as shear connector[J].IOP Conference Series:Materials Science and Engineering,2019,513(1):012038.
[4] 黄赛超，周旺华.二次受力混凝土叠合连续梁斜截面受力性能的试验研究[J].土木工程学报，1994,27(2):65-74.
[5] 周开富，魏欣，葛文杰，等.梁板叠合构件斜截面受力性能试验研究[J].建筑结构，2017,47(24):76-82.
[6] 袁海梅.新型叠合梁的抗弯性能研究[D].长沙：湖南大学，2013.
[7] 张多新，梁宾桥，廖松然.混凝土叠合梁设计理论综述[J].华北水利水电学院学报，2010,31(3):24-27.
[8] 王磊，彭笑川.叠合梁受弯性能试验研究[J].建筑结构，2013,43(8):51-53.
[9] 洪炳钦，杨俊杰，杨遒，等.叠合梁斜截面抗剪性能的试验研究[J].浙江工业大学学报，2007,35(4):464-468.
[10] 吴方伯，刘彪，邓利斌，等.新型叠合梁端部抗剪性能试验[J].建筑科学与工程学报，2014,31(2):26-31.
[11] 张雷，代领杰，胡翔，等.组合封闭箍筋混凝土叠合梁受扭性能试验[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报，2017,38(11):1745-1750.
[12] 装配式混凝土结构技术规程：JGJ 1—2014[S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2014.
[13] Building code requirements for structural concrete(ACI 318-02)and commentary (ACI 318R-02)[S].Farmington Hills:American Concrete Institute,2001.
[14] 普通混凝土力学性能试验方法标准：GB/T 50081—2002[S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2007.
Experimental study on shear performance of precast concrete composite beams connected by stirrup ring buckle
Abstract: In order to facilitate on-site construction, a new precast concrete composite beam connected by stirrup ring buckle is proposed. Four precast concrete composite beam specimens(including two "concave" shape composite beams and two "convex" shape composite beam) and two cast-in-place comparison beam specimens with different shear span ratios were designed and fabricated to carry out the monotonic concentrated loading test. Based on the analysis of the failure mode, the load-deflection curve and the stirrup strain of the specimens, the influence of the fabrication technology of the stirrup and the length of the stirrup connection on the shear performance of the composite beam was systematically studied. The test results show that shear failure occur in all specimens. The ring buckle connection stirrup can effectively transfer the shear force in the beam. The longitudinal reinforcement strain distribution of "convex" composite beam is basically the same as that of cast-in-place beam, and the longitudinal reinforcement strain of "concave" composite beam is quite different from that of cast-in-place beam. The failure load and initial stiffness of new composite beams are about 7% and 4% higher than that of cast-in-place beam. The "concave" shape composite beam is superior to the "convex" shape composite beam in terms of mechanical properties, manufacturing technology and field construction convenience.
Keywords: precast concrete composite beam; stirrup ring buckle connection; monotonic loading test; shear performance
627
0
0