华茂艺术教育博物馆

作者:郭屹民
单位:东南大学建筑学院 东南大学结构建筑学研究中心

 

悬浮的缝隙©侯博文(左)中庭坡道©侯博文(右)

悬浮的缝隙©侯博文(左)中庭坡道©侯博文(右)  下载原图

 

室内中庭©侯博文

室内中庭©侯博文  下载原图

 

作为改版后的核心栏目,本期“AT建筑”将为读者呈现“匿形的结构”——华茂艺术教育博物馆的最新思考。以下为推荐人郭屹民教授为项目撰写的上榜理由:

“光线、流动、曲面、坡道……,西扎的建筑在这些我们已然深谙的图景中,给予我们熟悉而又新鲜体验的同时,也似乎同那些用技术来武装的意图相去甚远。正因为如此,所以我们首先想澄清的是,选择西扎在国内的近作——‘华茂艺术教育博物馆’作为本期品鉴的研讨对象,并不是一次无脑的决定。相反,我们希望通过这个拥有柔美曲面和艺术化空间的建筑,来解锁技术的另一面(特别是结构表现的新视角)。

西扎在长年的建筑创作中的确很少谈及有关结构及技术的话题,不仅如此,在他那些充盈着想象力的构思草图以及那些并非轻易能够读懂的建筑图纸中,结构也绝不会被刻意地表达。因此,西扎的建筑有时会被认为是不重视结构的或者是非常感性的作品。但仅从形式上来判断空间与结构的关联,显然不够充分,因为除了性能之外,结构的表象与意义的作用也是不能被忽视的。与那些‘结构表现主义’忠实地将技术原理转译为建筑形式相比,西扎对于包括结构在内的技术表现可以认为是‘消极’的。但是,西扎在结构表现上的‘消极’换来的却是空间形式上的‘积极’——对建筑自由的获取。因此,我们有理由相信,这里被讨论的‘消极’与‘积极’或许正是透过技术所呈现的建筑观,也是对建筑‘技艺’的态度!西扎建筑作品中对结构的这种无为而谋,显然是经过深思熟虑的结果,也的确给我们带来了思考建筑与结构问题的另一种角度。我们相信,在那些显得不经意的创作与构思之中,一定深藏着西扎对于这一问题一贯的思考。

华茂艺术教育博物馆为我们提供了一次极好的机会:在一个几乎集结了西扎众多创作手法的大融合之中,我们有幸开启了本期的建筑技艺之旅!”

AT special will present readers with"anonymous structure"--the newest thinking of Huamao Museum of Art Education.The following is the reason why Professor Guo Yimin recommends this building:

"Light,flow,curved surface,ramps...In these scenes that we already know,Siza's architecture often gives us a familiar and fresh experience.At the same time,it also seems to be far from the intention of arming with technology.Because of this,we first want to clarify that it is not a brainless decision to choose Siza’s recent work in China–'Huamao Museum of Art Education'as the research object of this issue.On the contrary,we hope to unlock the other side of technology (especially the new perspective of structure expression) through this museum with soft curved surfaces and artistic space.

In his long term of architecture creation,Siza rarely talks about structure and techniques.Moreover,in his conceptual sketches and architectural drawings that are not easy to understand,the structure will never be deliberately expressed.Therefore,Siza's architecture is sometimes regarded as a work that does not pay attention to the structure or is very perceptual.However,it is insufficient to judge the relationship between space and structure only from the form,because the function of representation and meaning of structure in addition to the expression could not be ignored.Compared with those'Structural Expressionism'who faithfully translate technical principles into architectural forms,Siza can be regarded as'negative'for technical expression including structure.However,Siza's'negative'structure expression is in exchange for the'positive'spatial form--the acquisition of architectural freedom.Therefore,we believe that the'negative'and'positive'discussed here may be the architectural view presented through technology and the attitude towards architecture'techniques and art'!The inaction of structure in Siza's architectural works is the result of careful consideration,and it does bring us another way of thinking about architecture and structure.We believe that Siza's consistent thinking on this issue must be hidden in those casual creations and ideas.

Huamao Museum of Art Education provides us with an excellent opportunity:we are lucky to start this journey in a building that almost gathers all the creative techniques of Siza!"

作者图片

 

郭屹民

 

1296 0 0
文字:     A-     A+     默认 取消