低周往复作用下某新型装配式框架节点抗震性能试验研究
引用文献：
沈华 翁大根 张瑞甫 葛庆子 王庆华. 低周往复作用下某新型装配式框架节点抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构，2022，48（12）：56-63，108.
SHEN Hua WENG Dagen ZHANG Ruifu GE Qingzi WANG Qinghua. Experimental study on seismic performance of a new type of prefabricated frame joint under low-cycle reciprocating action[J]. Building Structure，2022,48（12）：56-63，108.
摘要：设计制作了一种新型H型钢削弱装配式框架节点(简称SPC节点)和对应相同尺寸的现浇节点，采用低周往复加载试验，研究对比了两种节点的抗震性能。重点分析了节点的破坏模式、裂缝分布、滞回曲线、骨架曲线、峰值延性、能量耗散系数、循环刚度和强度退化、截面弯矩转角、钢筋应变和型钢应变。结果表明：SPC节点的裂缝分布与现浇节点相近，但最大裂缝宽度得到有效控制。SPC节点滞回曲线更饱满，且随加载位移增加，无明显刚度退化。与现浇节点相比，SPC节点的承载力和延性得到显著改善。通过两种节点能量耗散系数的对比，结果表明SPC节点具有更好的强震耗能能力。强度和刚度受循环加载影响更小，故SPC节点的抗震性能更稳定。SPC节点梁端部截面具有更强的弯矩承载力和转动能力。同时，给出的SPC节点设计方法，能有效达成设计目标和实现“强柱弱梁”的要求。
关键词：装配式结构；框架节点；裂缝分布；抗震性能；弯矩承载力；转动能力
基金：国家自然科学基金(51978525)；江苏高校青蓝工程中青年学术带头人资助项目(2021)；南通市科技计划项目(MS22020025)；南通职业大学自然科学重点课题(2020A-2)。
尊敬的用户，本篇文章需要2元，点击支付交费后阅读
限时优惠福利：领取VIP会员
全年期刊、会议视频
全部免费！培训视频打折！
全年期刊、会议视频
全部免费！培训视频打折！
参考文献[1] PRIESTLEY N.Seismic design philosophy for precast concrete frames[J].Structural Engineering International,1996,6(1):25-31.
[2] 徐晓珂，王平山，李进军，等.部分包覆钢-混凝土组合结构技术体系的应用研究[J].建筑结构，2020,50(18):9-15,21.
[3] 边瑾靓，曹万林，张宗敏，等.不同构造对装配式钢管再生混凝土框架节点抗震性能的影响研究[J].建筑结构，2021,51(5):67-74,60.
[4] RONG X,YANG H W,ZHANG J X.Experimental study of precast beam-to-column joints with steel connectors under cyclic loading [J].Advances in Structural Engineering,2020,23(13):2822-2834.
[5] GHAYEB H H,RAZAK H A,SULONG N H R.Development and testing of hybrid precast concrete beam-to-column connections under cyclic loading [J].Construction and Building Materials,2017,151:258-278.
[6] NZABONIMPA J D,HONG W K,KIM J.Experimental and non-linear numerical investigation of the novel detachable mechanical joints with laminated plates for composite precast beam-column joint [J].Composite Structures,2018,185:286-303.
[7] ANINTHANENI P K,DHAKAL R P,MARSHALL J,et al.Nonlinear cyclic behaviour of precast concrete frame sub-assemblies with “dry”end plate connection[J].Structures,2018,14:124-136.
[8] NGO T T,PHAM T M,HAO H.Effects of steel fibres and prestress levels on behaviour of newly proposed exterior dry joints using SFRC and CFRP bolts[J].Engineering Structures,2020,205:110083.
[9] NAKAKI S D,ENGLEKIRK R E,PLAEHN J L.Ductile connectors for a precast concrete frame[J].PCI Journal,1994,39(5):46-59.
[10] ENGLEKIRK R E.Design and behavior of the super hybrid system [C]//Proceeding of Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute 53rd Annual Convention.Phoenix,Arizona,2007.
[11] 李向民，高润东，许清风.预制装配式混凝土框架高效延性节点试验研究[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,44(8):3453-3463.
[12] 李春雨，童超，吴京，等.可更换耗能连接件的装配式混凝土框架结构抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报，2022,43(1):69-76.
[13] 冯世强，杨勇，薛亦聪，等.预制装配式混合框架屈曲约束狗骨式节点抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报，2022,43(1):59-68.
[14] 建筑抗震设计规范：GB 50011—2010[S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2010.
[15] 混凝土结构设计规范：GB 50010—2010[S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2011.
[16] 钢结构设计标准：GB 50017—2017[S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2018.
[17] 熊仲明，王社良.土木工程结构试验[M].2版.北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2015.
[18] 钢筋焊接及验收规程：JGJ 18—2003[S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2004.
[19] 冯鹏，强翰霖，叶列平.材料、构件、结构的“屈服点”定义与讨论[J].工程力学，2017,34(3):36-46.
[20] 建筑抗震试验规程：JGJ/T 101—2015[S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2015.
[2] 徐晓珂，王平山，李进军，等.部分包覆钢-混凝土组合结构技术体系的应用研究[J].建筑结构，2020,50(18):9-15,21.
[3] 边瑾靓，曹万林，张宗敏，等.不同构造对装配式钢管再生混凝土框架节点抗震性能的影响研究[J].建筑结构，2021,51(5):67-74,60.
[4] RONG X,YANG H W,ZHANG J X.Experimental study of precast beam-to-column joints with steel connectors under cyclic loading [J].Advances in Structural Engineering,2020,23(13):2822-2834.
[5] GHAYEB H H,RAZAK H A,SULONG N H R.Development and testing of hybrid precast concrete beam-to-column connections under cyclic loading [J].Construction and Building Materials,2017,151:258-278.
[6] NZABONIMPA J D,HONG W K,KIM J.Experimental and non-linear numerical investigation of the novel detachable mechanical joints with laminated plates for composite precast beam-column joint [J].Composite Structures,2018,185:286-303.
[7] ANINTHANENI P K,DHAKAL R P,MARSHALL J,et al.Nonlinear cyclic behaviour of precast concrete frame sub-assemblies with “dry”end plate connection[J].Structures,2018,14:124-136.
[8] NGO T T,PHAM T M,HAO H.Effects of steel fibres and prestress levels on behaviour of newly proposed exterior dry joints using SFRC and CFRP bolts[J].Engineering Structures,2020,205:110083.
[9] NAKAKI S D,ENGLEKIRK R E,PLAEHN J L.Ductile connectors for a precast concrete frame[J].PCI Journal,1994,39(5):46-59.
[10] ENGLEKIRK R E.Design and behavior of the super hybrid system [C]//Proceeding of Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute 53rd Annual Convention.Phoenix,Arizona,2007.
[11] 李向民，高润东，许清风.预制装配式混凝土框架高效延性节点试验研究[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,44(8):3453-3463.
[12] 李春雨，童超，吴京，等.可更换耗能连接件的装配式混凝土框架结构抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报，2022,43(1):69-76.
[13] 冯世强，杨勇，薛亦聪，等.预制装配式混合框架屈曲约束狗骨式节点抗震性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报，2022,43(1):59-68.
[14] 建筑抗震设计规范：GB 50011—2010[S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2010.
[15] 混凝土结构设计规范：GB 50010—2010[S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2011.
[16] 钢结构设计标准：GB 50017—2017[S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2018.
[17] 熊仲明，王社良.土木工程结构试验[M].2版.北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2015.
[18] 钢筋焊接及验收规程：JGJ 18—2003[S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2004.
[19] 冯鹏，强翰霖，叶列平.材料、构件、结构的“屈服点”定义与讨论[J].工程力学，2017,34(3):36-46.
[20] 建筑抗震试验规程：JGJ/T 101—2015[S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2015.
Experimental study on seismic performance of a new type of prefabricated frame joint under low-cycle reciprocating action
Abstract: A new type of H-beam weakened prefabricated frame joint(SPC joint) and a cast-in-place joint corresponding to the same size were designed and fabricated. The seismic performance of the two joints was studied and compared by low-cycle reciprocating loading test. The failure mode, crack distribution, hysteresis curve, skeleton curve, peak ductility, energy dissipation coefficient, cyclic stiffness and strength degradation, section bending moment angle, steel bar strain and section steel strain were analyzed with emphasis. The results show that the crack distribution of the SPC joint is similar to that of the cast-in-place joint, but the maximum crack width is effectively controlled. The hysteresis curve of the SPC joint is fuller, and with the increase of loading displacement, there is no obvious stiffness degradation. The bearing capacity and ductility of SPC joints are significantly improved compared to cast-in-place joints. By comparing the energy dissipation coefficients of the two joints, the results show that the SPC joint has better energy dissipation capacity for strong earthquakes. The strength and stiffness are less affected by cyclic loading, so the seismic performance of the SPC joint is more stable. The end section of the SPC joint beam has stronger bending moment bearing capacity and rotational capacity. At the same time, the given SPC joint design method can effectively achieve the design goals and the requirements of "strong columns and weak beams".
Keywords: prefabricated structure; frame joint; crack distribution; seismic performance; bending moment bearing capacity; rotational capacity
412
0
0