对于建筑学而言，“技艺”应该具有更全面的含义，即不仅是“技术”与“艺术”的结合，而且应该理解为恰当应对和处理一切建筑学基本问题的一门“技艺”。在这里，我们或许可以区别建筑学问题和建筑学基本问题。建筑学问题涉及建筑学的外延和学科拓展，随着社会发展和时代条件不断发生变化，新的议题加入进来（比如国内建筑学科承接的各类纵向和横向研究课题），跨学科领域也随时可能出现，当然这其中也不乏昙花一现的情况。相比之下，建筑学基本问题则相对恒定，属于建筑学的内涵和学科核心，尽管这些建筑学基本问题本身的属性以及人们对它们的理解也处在改变之中。“技术”无疑属于建筑学基本问题之一，类似的建筑学基本问题还有“建造”“材料”“表面”“语言”“形式”“尺度”“体量”“空间”“类型”“光线”“内容计划”（Program）“设计概念”“场地”“环境”“布局”“路径”，等等。建筑学问题的回应和解决也许并不一定取决于“技艺”（如果我们是在Techne的意义上使用“技艺”一词的话），有时它们更需要政治和社会的力量；但是在我看来，建筑学基本问题的应对和处理确实可以被视为一门“技艺”。

《建筑技艺》本期报道的宁波东钱湖教育论坛大师创作室项目中的三个创作室由日本建筑师坂本一成教授及其团队设计。坂本一成教授曾以“日常的诗学”的主张和作为一种建筑设计方法的“建筑构成学”研究而著称。这些主张和研究都与建筑学基本问题紧密相关，而宁波项目则为“日常的诗学”和“建筑构成学”在具体环境和具体使用要求中的物化提供了一个可以具体讨论的案例。特别令人感兴趣的——也是设计者称之为极具“中国特点”和挑战性的——是建筑师在“内容计划”与“建筑构成”之间的互动，以及由此带来的积极成果，无论这体现在建筑空间方面还是在立面处理方面。

本次现场讨论会获得了多位学者与颇具思想活力的青年建筑师的积极参与，这确是《建筑技艺》的幸事，也是今后可以进一步加强的一种活动。活动还得到宁波华茂集团的大力支持，在此一并致谢！

For architecture,"technique"should have a more comprehensive meaning.It should not only be the combination of"technology"and"art",but also be understood as a"technique"to properly deal with all the basic problems of architecture.We may be able to distinguish between architectural problems and basic architectural problems.Architectural problems involve the extension and discipline expansion of architecture.With the continuous changes of social development and era conditions,new topics are added (such as various vertical and horizontal research topics).Interdisciplinary fields can also appear at any time.Of course,there are some short-lived situations.In contrast,the basic problems of architecture are relatively constant and belong to the connotation and subject core of architecture,although the attributes of these basic problems and people's understanding are also changing."Technology"is undoubtedly one of the basic problems of architecture.Similar basic problems of architecture include"construction","material","surface","language","form","scale","volume","space","type","light","program","design concept","site","environment","layout","path",etc.The response and solution of architectural problems may not necessarily depend on"technique"(in the sense of techne),sometimes they need more political and social forces.But in my opinion,dealing with the basic problems of architecture can indeed be regarded as a"techne".

The three Studios for Masters of Dongqianhu Education Forum reported in this issue are designed by Japanese architect professor Kazunari Sakamoto and his team.Professor Sakamoto was famous for his proposition of"daily poetics"and his research on"architectural composition"as an architectural design method.These studies are closely related to the basic problems of architecture.The project provides a case for the materialization of"daily poetics"and"architectural composition"in specific environment and use requirements.What is particularly interesting is the interaction between the architect's"program"and"architectural composition",and the resulting positive results,whether in architectural space or facade treatment.

This seminar also received the active participation of some scholars and a group of young architects with the most ideological vitality,which is indeed our pleasure.It is also an activity that can be further strengthened in the future.Also Thanks for the strong support of Huamao Group!